2013-08
2016-06
2016-06
20
NCT01921751
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
INTERVENTIONAL
High or Standard Intensity Radiation Therapy After Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Nab-paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
This randomized phase II trial studies how well high or standard intensity radiochemotherapy after gemcitabine hydrochloride and paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation (nab-paclitaxel) work compared with gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel alone in treating patients with pancreatic cancer that cannot be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing or by stopping them from spreading. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs, such as capecitabine, may make tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. Giving radiation therapy in different ways and adding chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether high intensity radiochemotherapy after gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel is more effective than standard intensity radiochemotherapy after gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel or gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel alone in treating pancreatic cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: * I. To determine if intensified radiochemotherapy following gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer will show a signal for improved 2-year overall survival (OS) from 10% to 22.5% as compared to chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone. * II. To determine if standard radiochemotherapy, following gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer will show a signal for improved 2-year OS from 10% to 22.5% as compared to chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: * I. To evaluate patterns of failure (local and systemic progression) by SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) status and intensity of radiation therapy. * II. To evaluate the impact of radiochemotherapy on OS for the subset of SMAD4 intact patients. * III. To evaluate adverse events associated with the treatments. * IV. To evaluate correlation between SMAD4 status determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and genetic SMAD4 status. Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month and then every 3 months.
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
---|---|---|
2013-08-09 | 2017-10-06 | 2018-06-14 |
2013-08-09 | 2018-03-21 | 2018-07-13 |
2013-08-13 | 2018-03-22 | 2018-06 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Allocation:
Randomized
Interventional Model:
Parallel
Masking:
None
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Chemotherapy + high intensity radiation Induction chemotherapy with four cycles of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel [randomized to this arm after 3rd cycle and no progression]; followed by concurrent high intensity radiation therapy and capecitabine; followed by consolidation chemotherapy with ge | DRUG: Capecitabine
DRUG: Gemcitabine
RADIATION: high intensity radiation therapy
DRUG: nab-Paclitaxel
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Chemotherapy + low intensity radiation Induction chemotherapy with four cycles of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel [randomized to this arm after 3rd cycle and no progression]; followed by concurrent low intensity radiation therapy and capecitabine; followed by consolidation chemotherapy with gem | RADIATION: low intensity radiation therapy
DRUG: Capecitabine
DRUG: Gemcitabine
DRUG: nab-Paclitaxel
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Chemotherapy Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel until progression or unacceptable toxicity [randomized to this arm after 3rd cycle and no progression] | RADIATION: low intensity radiation therapy
DRUG: Capecitabine
DRUG: Gemcitabine
RADIATION: high intensity radiation therapy
DRUG: nab-Paclitaxel
|
Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall Survival | Survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause and was to be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Given the limited follow-up due to early closure and termination of data collection, only the number of patients last reported to be alive at time of study termination is reported. | From randomization until last follow-up. Analysis was to occur after a total of 140 deaths were reported within the pairing of each radiation arm with the chemotherapy alone arm. Maximum follow-up at time of study termination was 8.3 months. |
Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall Survival Within SMAD4 Subsets | Survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause and was to be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Given the limited follow-up due to early closure and termination of data collection, only the number of patients last reported to be alive at time of study termination is reported. Patients are categorized by SMAD4 status of "intact" (positive nuclear labeling is observed of the neoplastic cells ), "loss" (no labeling observed of the neoplastic cells) , or "undetermined" (insufficient material for immunostaining or results are equivocal). This study terminated early with only 20 registered (346 planned) and 13 randomized (288 planned). There are no proven results as to which category has better incomes, but this study hypothesizes that "intact" is highly correlated with local failures and "loss" is highly correlated with widespread metastasis, in which case "intact" would correspond with positive results relative to "loss". | From randomization until last follow-up. Analysis was to occur after a total of 140 deaths were reported within the pairing of each radiation arm with the chemotherapy alone arm. Maximum follow-up at time of study termination was 8.3 months. |
Patterns of Failure (Local and Metastatic Failure) | Local progression is defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the primary, taking as reference the baseline sum. Given the inherent inaccuracy in determining size of a primary pancreatic carcinoma, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm and progression must be demonstrated on at least two sequential scans. Metastatic failure is defined as metastatic disease. Local and distant failure were to be estimated by the cumulative incidence method. Given the limited follow-up due to early closure and termination of data collection, only the number of patients with failure is reported. | From randomization until last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of study termination was 8.3 months. |
Correlation Between SMAD4 Status Determined by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Genetic SMAD4 Status | Baseline |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
NPCF was founded on May 29, 2009 and is a 501(c)(3) organization. All donations are tax deductible.
The information and services provided by the National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation are for informational purposes only. The information and services are not intended to be substitutes for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. The National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation does not recommend nor endorse any specific physicians, products or treatments even though they may be mentioned on this site.
Copyright © 2024 – National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation | All Rights Reserved