Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Evaluation of a New EUS Guided Biopsy Needle (SharkCore) Comparing to Standard EUS Needle (ProCore)


2016-04


2017-02


2017-02


0

Study Overview

Evaluation of a New EUS Guided Biopsy Needle (SharkCore) Comparing to Standard EUS Needle (ProCore)

Diagnosis of lesions of pancreas, the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as adjacent structures, such as lymph nodes, is still showing advancements especially with the increased use of endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have become mainstay diagnostic techniques for these lesions. The purpose of the study is to compare between the currently used, ProCore needles and the new biopsy needle, SharkCore, for the histological diagnosis and evaluation of lesions.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have become mainstay diagnostic techniques for the diagnosis and evaluation of lesions of the pancreas, the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as adjacent structures, including lymph nodes. Cytology specimens provided from FNA cannot fully characterize certain neoplasms such as lymphomas or mesenchymal tumors. Core biopsy specimens for histological examinations are needed to provide accurate diagnoses. ProCore needles (ProCore, Wilson-Cook Medical Inc. Winston-Salem, NC) were designed to obtain histological and cytological samples. Studies comparing ProCore needles with standard FNA needles showed no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy, histological core tissue procurement or mean number of passes. To overcome the above mentioned limitations (mainly suboptimal core tissue procurement rates), a new novel SharkCore needle (Beacon Endoscopic, Newton, MA, USA) has been designed and approved for clinical human use by the FDA. The objective of the study is to compare the new EUS guided histology biopsy needle SharkCore to the currently used EUS histology needle, ProCore, for the histological diagnosis and evaluation of lesions.

  • Mesenchymal Tumor
  • Autoimmune Pancreatitis
  • Lymphoma
  • Solid Tumors
  • PROCEDURE: EUS-FNB with ProCore needle
  • PROCEDURE: EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle
  • DEVICE: ProCore needle
  • DEVICE: SharkCore needle
  • IRB00095614

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2016-05-06  

N/A  

2017-05-11  

2016-05-06  

N/A  

2017-05-15  

2016-05-10  

N/A  

2017-05  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic


Allocation:
Randomized


Interventional Model:
Parallel


Masking:
Single


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: EUS-FNB with ProCore needle

General anesthesia or conscious sedation will be started and an upper endoscopic ultrasound will be inserted into the participants mouth and advanced to the site of the lesion. The lesion will be punctured by the ProCore needle, then the stylet is complet

PROCEDURE: EUS-FNB with ProCore needle

  • The use of the standard ProCore needle to acquire diagnostic tissue

DEVICE: ProCore needle

  • This is the standard needle used currently to procure tissue from lesions under endoscopic ultrasound guidance
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle

The procedure will be done in the same manner with same endoscopic technique and method of tissue procurement. The only difference will be using the SharkCore needle to acquire tissue.

PROCEDURE: EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle

  • The use of new SharkCore needle to acquire diagnostic tissue

DEVICE: SharkCore needle

  • This is the new FDA approved needle for tissue procurement under endoscopic ultrasound guidance.
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of needle as assessed by diagnostic yield of needle and final diagnosis methodThe final diagnosis of tissue from needle will be compared to the final diagnosis reached either by surgical removal of mass or other method of biopsyUp to 1 month
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Number of passes to procure core tissue from needleThe number of passes needed to acquire core tissue as assessed by the pathologist in the room.During procedure
Safety of tissue procurement by needleAll complications related to needle used will be recorded with a preset questionnaire to measure the frequency of complications related to needle used.Up to 1 year
Procedure timeTime required to acquire tissue using each needle will be recorded from time of needle insertion to time of core tissue procurement as per pathologist.During procedure

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria:
    Patients ≥ 18 years of age referred for EUS
    Lesions requiring histologic diagnosis:

  • Mesenchymal tumors
  • Autoimmune pancreatitis
  • Granulomatous disease
  • Indeterminate hepatitis
  • Confirmatory immunochemistry to establish a diagnosis (i.e. pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor)
  • Lymphoma
  • Solid tumors
  • Previously non-diagnostic FNA

  • Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5)
  • Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (platelet < 50,000)
  • Uncooperative patients
  • Pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo urine pregnancy testing, which is routine for all endoscopic procedures)
  • Refusal to consent form
  • Cystic lesions
  • Inaccessible lesions to EUS (proximal to sigmoid colon or distal to second duodenum)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.


    • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Mouen Khashab, MD, Johns Hopkins University

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    No publications available