Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

The Role of Muscle Cachexia in Pancreatic Cancer


2016-03


2023-06-23


2023-06-23


0

Study Overview

The Role of Muscle Cachexia in Pancreatic Cancer

The relationship between myopenia, nutritional status, and long-term oncologic outcomes remains poorly characterized in patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic cancer (PC). The investigators want to look at muscle properties in pancreatic cancer patients to determine possible therapeutic options toward better nutritional status. Patients with benign right upper quadrant pathology will be utilized as controls for the study. The researchers hypothesize that improving cancer cachexia in PC will improve the quality of life and ultimately increase overall survival. The long term goal of is to identify areas of intervention to prevent and/or improve cachectic events in PC in order to significantly improve clinical outcomes. The first step in this long term goal is to fully characterize cachexia in the condition of PC. This research is to understand and modify the local response within skeletal muscle leading to a clinically relevant persistent wasting and to understand and interrupt the systemic stimulus produced by the tumor local environment resulting in these muscle specific mechanisms.

Cancer cachexia (CC) is a devastating condition affecting up to 80% of cancer patients, diminishing quality of life and contributing to increased mortality. Cancer cachexia is a complex metabolic syndrome characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle mass and weakness. The muscle pathology of cancer cachexia is not only related to muscle atrophy but also to disruptions to the contractile apparatus of the muscle. While physiologic disruptions in muscle sarcomere and myofiber membrane integrity have been observed despite the lack of injury, the totality of the muscle specific mechanisms contributing to these phenotypes have not been described, nor investigated in the context of pancreatic cancer (PC) where cachexia is a significant clinical problem. Therefore, delineating specific mechanisms of muscle catabolism in PC is critical to developing clinical therapies to control wasting and improve patient quality of life, clinical outcomes and long-term survival. A variety of tumor promoting and inflammatory cell signaling pathways have been implicated in cancer cachexia, whereby pro-inflammatory cytokines have been implicated as a driving force. Remarkably, approximately half of all patients with PC demonstrate a measurable acute phase response, which is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Importantly, systemic elevations of these inflammatory mediators are due to a complex local interplay between the developing tumor and the immune system which subsequently leads to a systemic chronic inflammatory state. PC appears to manipulate the immune system to promote its survival at the expense of nutritional stores which results in cachexia. Therefore, understanding of the local and systemic inflammatory response in PC and its relation to muscle specific mechanisms is crucial to developing effective therapies for cancer cachexia. PC associated cachexia results in a significant therapeutic dilemma. Local approaches such as surgery for curative intent encounter a high recurrence rate which is indicative of the systemic nature of even very early-stage disease. Therefore, systemic therapies are necessary for long-term survival. Unfortunately, effective chemotherapies are only offered to patients with good clinical parameters such as nutritional status. In other words, if the patient is too weak, they are not offered effective therapies for the risk of causing more harm than good.

  • Pancreas Cancer
  • PROCEDURE: Muscle Tissue Biopsy Sample
  • IRB201500239 - N
  • 2R01AR060209-06A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2015-06-03  

N/A  

2023-06-26  

2015-08-03  

N/A  

2023-06-28  

2015-08-04  

N/A  

2023-06  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Basic Science


Allocation:
Non Randomized


Interventional Model:
Parallel


Masking:
None


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Pancreatic Cancer Patients

During the surgical resection for the pancreatic cancer a muscle tissue biopsy sample will be performed.

PROCEDURE: Muscle Tissue Biopsy Sample

  • During surgical resection, to enter the abdominal cavity, anterior muscle groups such as the rectus abdominous muscle. This group of muscle is divided. During division, muscle fibers are released from fascial group and discarded off the operative field. T
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Surgical Patients with benign pathology

During surgical resection for patients with benign right upper quadrant pathology, a muscle tissue biopsy sample will be performed.

PROCEDURE: Muscle Tissue Biopsy Sample

  • During surgical resection, to enter the abdominal cavity, anterior muscle groups such as the rectus abdominous muscle. This group of muscle is divided. During division, muscle fibers are released from fascial group and discarded off the operative field. T
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Ultrastructural abnormalities in muscle tissue samples between the groupsTo look at the extent of ultrastructural abnormalities in the skeletal muscle by histologic examination of muscle biopsiesday 1
Myofiber atrophy in muscle tissue samples between the groups2) identify the growth and atrophy-related transcription factors associated with the muscle pathology and 3) identify the genome-wide gene networks and biological process associated with skeletal muscle pathology in surgically resected PC patients and healthy control patients by RT-PCR and histologic staining of tissues for transcriptional factors associated with cachexia.day 1
Identify gene networks within the skeletal muscle between the groupsRT-PCR of RNA from biopsied muscle tissuesday 1
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
History of weight lostClinical assessment at treatment follow-upBaseline
Nutritional statusClinical assessment at treatment follow-upApproximately 2 years
Blood Chemistry compositeClinical assessment at treatment follow-upApproximately 2 years
Preoperative sarcopenia using a muscular indexClinical assessment at treatment follow-up and radiographic measurements of muscle groups on routine surveillance for cancer recurrence or advancementApproximately 2 years
Measurement of lymphatic metastasisPathologic specimen at time of resection to determine extent of pathologic stage which is routineApproximately 2 years
Tumor gradeNoted at pathologic assessment and part of routine examinationApproximately 2 years
Survival dataNoted on routine follow-upApproximately 2 years

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pancreatic Cancer Patients who are potentially surgically resectable.

  • Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not meet the criteria for surgical resection.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

  • The V Foundation for Cancer Research
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

  • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Andrew Judge, PhD, University of Florida

Publications

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Tisdale MJ. Mechanisms of cancer cachexia. Physiol Rev. 2009 Apr;89(2):381-410. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00016.2008.
  • Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argiles J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, Jatoi A, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lochs H, Mantovani G, Marks D, Mitch WE, Muscaritoli M, Najand A, Ponikowski P, Rossi Fanelli F, Schambelan M, Schols A, Schuster M, Thomas D, Wolfe R, Anker SD. Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;27(6):793-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Aug 21.