Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

The Impact of Immunostimulating Nutrition on the Outcome of Surgery


2001-06


N/A


2005-12


214

Study Overview

The Impact of Immunostimulating Nutrition on the Outcome of Surgery

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical effect of immunostimulatory enteral and parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing resection for gastrointestinal cancer. 205 subjects were randomly assigned into four study groups, standard and immunostimulating, enteral and parenteral. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that immunonutrition and enteral nutrition would reduce the incidence of infectious complications following upper gastrointestinal surgery.

All patients qualified between June 2001 and December 2005 to total and distal subtotal gastrectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy were screened for eligibility to participate in the study. Additional eligibility criteria included: age between 18 and 80 years, Karnofsky performance status score of 80 or more, and adequate organ function measured by routine blood tests. Patients requiring preoperative nutritional support, as well as those with disseminated tumors, serious comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class of 4 or 5), and renal or liver failure were excluded. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that immunonutrition and enteral nutrition would reduce the incidence of infectious complications following upper gastrointestinal surgery. Therefore, patients were randomly assigned in a 2×2 factorial design to four groups receiving immunostimulating versus normal diets, and enteral versus intravenous nutritional support. The secondary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of nutritional intervention on overall morbidity and mortality rates, and the length of hospital stay. After completing tumor resection, patients who met the eligibility criteria were intraoperatively assigned to either of the treatment groups using sealed envelopes containing computer-generated allocation numbers. The following groups were generated: standard enteral nutrition (SEN), immunostimulating enteral nutrition (IMEN), standard parenteral nutrition (SPN), and immunostimulating parenteral nutrition (IMPN). The study was carried out following the international ethical recommendations stated in the Declaration of Helsinki.

  • Gastric Cancer
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • DRUG: peptisorb
  • DRUG: Stresson
  • DRUG: Parenteral nutrition
  • DRUG: Omegaven, Dipeptiven
  • 1st Dept Surg

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2007-11-09  

N/A  

2007-11-13  

2007-11-13  

N/A  

2007-11-14  

2007-11-14  

N/A  

2007-11  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Treatment


Allocation:
Randomized


Interventional Model:
Crossover


Masking:
None


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: SEN

standard enteral nutrition

DRUG: peptisorb

  • standard isocaloric eteral diet (1 ml = 1 kcal)
EXPERIMENTAL: IMEN

immunostimulating enteral nutrition

DRUG: Stresson

  • Oligopeptic, enteral diet (1 ml=1.25 kcal)
EXPERIMENTAL: SPN

standard parenteral nutrition

DRUG: Parenteral nutrition

  • Protein requirements were covered by 10 and 15% amino acid solutions (Aminoplasmal, B Braun, Poland). Energy requirements were covered by glucose (10, 20 and 40% solutions, B Braun, Poland) and lipid emulsions (10 and 20% Lipofundin MCT/ LCT, B Braun, Pol
EXPERIMENTAL: IMPN

immunostimulating parenteral nutrition

DRUG: Omegaven, Dipeptiven

  • Immunostimulating components: Omegaven (omega-3-fatty acids) and Dipeptiven (Glutamine Arginine) Protein requirements were covered by 10 and 15% amino acid solutions (Aminoplasmal, B Braun, Poland). Energy requirements were covered by glucose (10, 20 and
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
During the postoperative period, all patients were observed for both surgical and non-surgical complications52 months
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
The secondary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of nutritional intervention on overall morbidity and mortality rates, and hospital stay.52 months

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
1

    Inclusion Criteria:

  • resectable gastric or pancreatic cancer
  • age between 18 and 80 years,
  • Karnofsky performance status score of 80 or more,
  • adequate organ function

  • Exclusion Criteria:

  • unresectable gastric or pancreatic cancer
  • patients requiring preoperative nutritional support,
  • disseminated tumors,
  • serious comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class of 4 or 5),
  • renal or liver failure were excluded

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.


    • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Stanislaw Klek, PhD, MD, Jagiellonian University 1 Dept Surgery

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    • Klek S, Sierzega M, Szybinski P, Szczepanek K, Scislo L, Walewska E, Kulig J. Perioperative nutrition in malnourished surgical cancer patients - a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2011 Dec;30(6):708-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
    • Klek S, Kulig J, Sierzega M, Szybinski P, Szczepanek K, Kubisz A, Kowalczyk T, Gach T, Pach R, Szczepanik AM. The impact of immunostimulating nutrition on infectious complications after upper gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):212-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318180a3c1.