Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Study to Evaluate Efficacy of CO-1.01 as Second Line Therapy for Gemcitabine-Refractory Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma


2011-04


2013-03


2013-03


19

Study Overview

Study to Evaluate Efficacy of CO-1.01 as Second Line Therapy for Gemcitabine-Refractory Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

The purpose of this study is to determine whether CO-1.01 is safe and effective for treating metastatic pancreatic cancer that did not respond to gemcitabine.

Pancreatic tumors with low hENT1 expression may show less benefit from gemcitabine compared with those with higher expression of this nucleoside transporter. Nonclinical studies indicate that CO-1.01, a gemcitabine derivative, is effective independent of such transporters. Thus patients with low or no meaningful expression of hENT1 who failed to respond to gemcitabine might derive benefit from CO1.01 before needing alternative (combination) chemotherapy. Furthermore, the PK profiles of CO-1.01 and gemcitabine are dissimilar and this may confer additional clinical benefit on CO1.01.

  • Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
  • DRUG: CO-1.01
  • CO-101-003

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2010-10-26  

N/A  

2019-03-05  

2010-11-01  

N/A  

2019-03-11  

2010-11-03  

N/A  

2019-03  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Treatment


Allocation:
Non Randomized


Interventional Model:
Single Group


Masking:
None


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: CO-1.01

DRUG: CO-1.01

  • 1250 mg/m2/day administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 in 4-week treatment cycles. Patients who have SD or better at the Week 8 assessment and who adequately tolerated the first 2 cycles of treatment may continue CO-1.01 at the same or an increased dose (1400
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Disease Control Rate (CR, PR, or SD) using RECIST 1.1Every 8 weeks until disease progression
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Every 8 weeks
CA 19-9 response rateEvery 4 weeks
Progression-free survival (PFS)Every 8 weeks
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityEvery week
Overall survival (OS)3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Median progression-free survival3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Median overall survival3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Duration of responseEvery 8 weeks

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Gemcitabine-refractory metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

  • At least 1 measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1 criteria
  • Computerized tomography (CT) scan ≤ 28 days prior to CO-1.01
  • First-line treatment included at least 3 doses of gemcitabine (as monotherapy or combination therapy) with the last dose administered at least 2 weeks prior to CO 1.01
  • Radiological best response of disease progression after 1st-line treatment (no radiological stable disease or better allowed at any time)
  • Patients who experienced progressive disease during (neo)-adjuvant gemcitabine-based therapy are also eligible
  • Patients who have completed previous adjuvant therapy without progression, then subsequently have a radiological best response of disease progression on 1st line gemcitabine for metastatic disease are eligible 2. No hENT1 expression in primary or metastatic tumor sample, confirmed with IHC by a core pathology laboratory prior to study entry also eligible 3. Performance Status (ECOG) 0 or 1 4. Age ≥18 years 5. Palliative radiotherapy (if administered) ≥2 weeks prior to CO-1.01 6. Adequate hematological and biological function, with no residual gemcitabine-related toxicity 7. Written consent on an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved IC Form prior to any study-specific evaluation

  • Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Patients who have had stable disease, partial response or complete response to first line gemcitabine-based therapy 2. First-line chemotherapy regimen that does not contain gemcitabine 3. First-line treatment discontinued due to intolerable gemcitabine-induced toxicity 4. Second or subsequent line therapy for advanced disease. Prior exposure to CO-1.01 or prior randomization in a protocol studying CO-1.01 (e.g.,Protocol CO-101-001) 5. Tumor that cannot be evaluated for hENT1 expression or that has hENT1 staining in >50% of cells 6. Symptomatic brain metastases 7. Concomitant treatment with prohibited medications (e.g., concurrent anticancer therapy including other chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal treatment [except corticosteroids and megestrol acetate], or immunotherapy) ≤14 days prior to CO-1.01 8. Exploratory laparotomy, palliative (e.g., bypass) surgery, or other procedures are not allowed <14 days prior to CO-1.01 administration; stenting procedures are permissible at any time prior to dosing; in all cases, the patient must be sufficiently recovered and stable 9. History of allergy to gemcitabine or eggs 10. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding 11. Refusal to use adequate contraception for fertile patients (females and males during the study and for 6 months after the last dose of CO-1.01) 12. Presence of any serious or unstable concomitant systemic disorder incompatible with the clinical study (e.g., substance abuse, psychiatric disturbance, uncontrolled intercurrent illness including active infection, arterial thrombosis, or symptomatic pulmonary embolism) 13. Any other reason for which the investigator considers the patient should not participate in the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.


    • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Eileen O'Reilly, M.D., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    No publications available