Phase II/III of Randomized Controlled Clinical Research on IRE Synchronous Chemotherapy for LAPC

Previous studies have shown that irreversible electroporation (IRE) preoperative induction chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy after IRE can reduce the local recurrence rate of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and benefit the survival of patients. According to the technical principle of electroporation therapy (EPT), when the cell membrane is electroporated, the resistance of cell membrane decreases instantaneously, which promotes the drug to enter tumor cells and significantly increases its cytotoxicity and killing effect on tumor tissue. The purpose of study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous gemcitabine administration and IRE for treating LAPC. In order to provide new ideas for the treatment of LAPC.

Improving Surgeon Performance Measures for Robot-Assisted Surgery

The purpose of this study is to develop new tools to understand surgeon performance to improve surgical training and participant outcomes after surgery.

Oral Microbiome and Pancreatic Cancer

This is a prospective population based study to examine the relationship of oral and pancreatic microbiome, and their functions, to pancreatic cancer risk.

The identification of specific oral bacteria and their functional relationship to pancreatic cancer will advance scientific knowledge on the etiology of pancreatic cancer. This could provide a new microbially-based research paradigm, possibly leading to new drug targets for this disease. Second, the oral bacteria may serve as a readily accessible, non-invasive biomarker for subsequent pancreatic cancer risk, which help to identify people at high risk of this disease. Finally, the identified oral bacteria may lead to microbial prophylactic preventions, with antibiotic therapy aimed at eradicating the specific species associated with increased cancer risk or, alternatively, combined with probiotics to introduce species that are associated with a decreased cancer risk. Thus, the study outcomes will lead to actionable means for pancreatic cancer prevention.

A Study Evaluating Different Doses of BI 765049 When Given Alone and When Given With Ezabenlimab to Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Expressing the Protein B7-H6 on the Cell Surface

This study is open to adults with advanced solid tumors whose previous cancer treatment was not successful. People can participate if their tumor has the B7-H6 marker or if they have colorectal cancer.

The study tests 2 medicines called BI 765049 and ezabenlimab (BI 754091). Both medicines may help the immune system fight cancer.

The purpose of this study is to find out the highest dose of BI 765049 alone and in combination with ezabenlimab the participants can tolerate. In this study, BI 765049 is given to people for the first time.

Participants can stay in the study for up to 3 years, if they benefit from treatment and can tolerate it. During this time, they get BI 765049 alone or in combination with ezabenlimab as infusion into a vein every 3 weeks.

The doctors check the health of the participants and note any health problems that could have been caused by BI 765049 or ezabenlimab. The doctors also regularly monitor the size of the tumor.

Chiauranib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Chiauranib , which simultaneously targets against VEGFR/Aurora B/CSF-1R, several key kinases involved in tumor angiogenesis, tumor cell mitosis, and chronic inflammatory microenvironment.

Gemcitabine, Capecitabine, and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Bevacizumab may stop the growth of tumor cells by stopping blood flow to the tumor. Giving gemcitabine and capecitabine together with bevacizumab may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving gemcitabine and capecitabine together with bevacizumab works in treating patients with metastatic or unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Enteral Nutrition After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the treatment of choice for resectable periampullary cancer. PD is still associated with a relatively a high incidence of delayed gastric emptying. And, there are no acknowledged strategies to avoid DGE. Several feeding strategies have been investigated to cope with this problem. However, there is still no consensus concerning the best nutrition support method after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of nutrition support methods on DGE after pancreaticoduodenectomy: early enteral nutrition or total parenteral nutrition.

Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy will be randomized to receive early enteral nutrition (EN group), or Saline administration (Saline group), or oral intake only (Natural control). The EN group will receive standard enteral diet administered through a nasojejunal tube. Enteral nutrition will be started on the 1st postoperative day and increased daily by 20-40 ml up to the estimated level. The Saline group will receive saline administered through a nasojejunal tube beginning from the 1st postoperative day. Oral intake will not be restricted in all three group.

Gemcitabine With or Without Dalteparin in Treating Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Anticoagulants such as dalteparin may help prevent blood clots in patients being treated with gemcitabine for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of gemcitabine with or without dalteparin in treating patients who have unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

The Canadian/US Integrative Oncology Study

This study describes the survival outcomes of advanced stage breast, colorectal, ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients receiving advanced integrative oncology (AIO) treatment at participating North American integrative oncology clinics. This study also aims to describe the integrative treatments recommended by naturopathic doctors (NDs) for these participants alongside their conventional care treatments. Sub-studies will evaluate health-related quality of life, cost of cancer care, and qualitative experience of care in a subset of Canadian participants.

Multi-center, Open-label, Phase 1b Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Exploratory Efficacy of TEW-7197 in Combination With FOLFOX in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Have Failed First-Line Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel

* Inclusion

1. Subjects who are males or females ≥ 19 years of age
2. Subjects who have the following history of first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel among patients with cytologically or histologically proven metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
3. Subjects who can give written informed consent for participation in this trial after receiving explanations of this trial
4. Subjects who have the following laboratory test values:

* bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN (upper limit of normal)
* aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 5 x ULN
* serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULNor estimated creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault)
* partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≤ 1.5 x ULN
* absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500 cells/µL
* platelet count ≥ 100,000/µL
* hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL
5. Subjects who have at least a 12-week life expectancy at the Investigator's discretion
6. Subjects who have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)Performance Status 0-1
* Exclusion

1. Subjects who were treated with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or investigational therapy within 2 weeks (note: placement of biliary stent is allowed)
2. Subjects who have uncontrolled CNS metastases (patients who require steroids should be on a stable or decreasing dose for at least 2 weeks)
3. Subjects who have any contraindications for 5-FU, leucovorin, or oxaliplatin
4. Subjects who have moderate or severe cardiovascular disease

* Subjects who have myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV congestive heart failure, or uncontrolled hypertension within 6 months before screening
* Subjects who have major abnormalities at the Investigator's discretion based on electrocardiogram (ECG)and Doppler ECHO results at screening or within 14 days before screening
* Subjects who have increase in brain natriuretic peptide(BNP) or increase in troponin (over 99th percentile upper reference limit) at Screening (based on the normal range of relevant study center)
* Subjects who have risk factors for ascending aortic aneurysm such as genetic disorder and trauma and risk factors for aortic stenosis
* Subjects who have a history of heart or aorta surgery
5. Subjects who have clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 4 weeks before screening
6. Subjects who have a known history or suspected hypersensitivity to any excipients of the investigational product or combination drug(s)
7. Subjects who have received prior treatment targeting the signaling pathway of TGF-β
8. Subjects who have a disease or condition that affects the mechanism of the investigational product, or are currently using or planning to use:

* Drugs that are exclusively or primarily eliminated by cytochrome P-450 isozyme (CYP) including CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4
* Drugs that are exclusively or primarily eliminated by UDP glucuronyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 (UGT1A1)
* Drugs that are substrates for the drug transporter multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) have a narrow therapeutic window or are strong inhibitors of drug transporter MDR1
* Drugs that are strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4
9. Subjects who are unable to swallow tablets
10. Subjects who have a history of or are suspected of drug abuse
11. Female subjects of child-bearing potential who have a positive result on a pregnancy test at screening or are unable to agree to use an effective barrier method of birth control to avoid pregnancy during the study period (e.g., sterilization, intrauterine contraceptive device, combination of oral contraception and barrier contraception, combination of other hormone delivery systems and barrier contraception, contraceptive cream, combination of cream, jelly, or form and diaphragm or condom)
12. Subjects, in the opinion of the Investigator, who are unsuitable to participate in the study
13. Subjects who were treated with other investigational products within 28 days before screening or within a period shorter than 5-timesthe half-life of the investigational product