Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Nutrition and Pharmacological Algorithm for Oncology Patients Study


2021-03-01


2021-04-05


2021-04-05


1

Study Overview

Nutrition and Pharmacological Algorithm for Oncology Patients Study

Loss of appetite is a common symptom of patients with cancer and can cause distress which impacts patients and caregivers. Patients diagnosed with head/neck, lung or pancreatic cancer will be recruited for this study to decrease the suffering and distress associated with eating during cancer treatment and improve the quality of life of patients by implementing an algorithm utilizing nutrition intervention and appetite stimulants.

N/A

  • Oncologic Complications
  • Quality of Life
  • Nutrition Poor
  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Lung Cancer
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • DRUG: Dexamethasone
  • DRUG: Dronabinol
  • DRUG: Mirtazapine
  • BEHAVIORAL: Nutrition Intervention
  • 2019-10218

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2019-10-31  

2022-09-28  

2022-10-24  

2019-11-04  

2022-10-24  

2022-11-16  

2019-11-07  

2022-11-16  

2022-10  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care


Allocation:
Non Randomized


Interventional Model:
Parallel


Masking:
None


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Patients with fair to good appetite

The patients with fair-good appetite (score on CNAQ more than 24) will not receive any pharmacological agents and will receive nutrition intervention alone. CNAQ = Council on Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire

BEHAVIORAL: Nutrition Intervention

  • Nutrition intervention will be in accordance with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics guidelines. The intervention will involve "purposefully planned action(s) designed with the intent of changing a nutrition-related behavior, risk factor, environmenta
EXPERIMENTAL: Patients with poor to fair appetite

The patients with poor-fair appetite (score on CNAQ less than 24) will be provided nutrition intervention by the Registered Dietitian and then put into one of three pharmacological groups. CNAQ = Council on Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire

DRUG: Dexamethasone

  • If the patient's prognosis is extremely poor (less than 12 weeks expected survival, based on discussion with the patient's treating physicians) and there is no additional disease modifying therapy planned, the patient will be prescribed 4mg dexa

DRUG: Dronabinol

  • If the patient has a history of marijuana use or has tried it in the past and had a positive experience with it, then the patient will be prescribed dronabinol (which is FDA approved) 2.5mg, twice daily before meals.

DRUG: Mirtazapine

  • If the patient does not have any history of marijuana use, mirtazapine will be prescribed. If the patient is under the age of 70, then the patient would be prescribed 15mg of mirtazapine (which is FDA approved), once daily, to be taken orally at bedtime.

BEHAVIORAL: Nutrition Intervention

  • Nutrition intervention will be in accordance with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics guidelines. The intervention will involve "purposefully planned action(s) designed with the intent of changing a nutrition-related behavior, risk factor, environmenta
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Quality of Life AssessmentThe primary outcome of this study is assessing the impact on quality of life for the oncology patients by using an algorithm for nutrition intervention and appetite stimulants through utilizing Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Population (FACT-GP).3 months
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Quality of Life/Appetite AssessmentThe secondary outcome of this study is assessing the impact on quality of life/appetite for the oncology patients by using an algorithm for nutrition intervention and appetite stimulants through utilizing the Council of Nutrition appetite questionnaire.3 months

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Patients with a diagnosis of head/neck, lung, pancreatic cancer, or metastatic cancer from any solid tumor 2. Planned, ongoing, or recently treated patient (within the past 30 days) with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or intravenous targeted biologic therapy 3. No previous use of appetite stimulants 4. All patients must sign study specific informed consent prior to being included in the study 5. No contraindication to appetite stimulants
    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Patient <18 years old 2. Contraindication to appetite stimulants

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.


    • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Justin Tang, MD, Montefiore Medical Center

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    • Swan WI, Vivanti A, Hakel-Smith NA, Hotson B, Orrevall Y, Trostler N, Beck Howarter K, Papoutsakis C. Nutrition Care Process and Model Update: Toward Realizing People-Centered Care and Outcomes Management. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;117(12):2003-2014. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Oct 5. No abstract available.
    • Janda M, DiSipio T, Hurst C, Cella D, Newman B. The Queensland Cancer Risk Study: general population norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Psychooncology. 2009 Jun;18(6):606-14. doi: 10.1002/pon.1428.
    • Doll KM, Kalinowski AK, Snavely AC, Irwin DE, Bensen JT, Bae-Jump VL, Kim KH, Van Le L, Clarke-Pearson DL, Gehrig PA. Obesity is associated with worse quality of life in women with gynecologic malignancies: an opportunity to improve patient-centered outcomes. Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;121(3):395-402. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29061. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
    • Dapueto JJ, Francolino C, Servente L, Chang CH, Gotta I, Levin R, Abreu Mdel C. Evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Spanish Version 4 in South America: classic psychometric and item response theory analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 20;1:32. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-32.
    • Sim BY, Lee YW, Kim H, Kim SH. Post-traumatic growth in stomach cancer survivors: Prevalence, correlates and relationship with health-related quality of life. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Jun;19(3):230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
    • Alvarez-Camacho M, Martinez-Michel L, Gonella S, Scrimger RA, Chu KP, Wismer WV. Physical symptom burden of post-treatment head and neck cancer patients influences their characterization of food: Findings of a repertory grid study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Jun;22:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
    • Holm T, Maier A, Wicks P, Lang D, Linke P, Munch C, Steinfurth L, Meyer R, Meyer T. Severe loss of appetite in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: online self-assessment study. Interact J Med Res. 2013 Apr 17;2(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2463.
    • Mattox TW. Cancer Cachexia: Cause, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;32(5):599-606. doi: 10.1177/0884533617722986. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
    • Cox S, Powell C, Carter B, Hurt C, Mukherjee S, Crosby TD. Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1. Br J Cancer. 2016 Jul 12;115(2):172-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.129. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
    • Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Marques Vidal P, Camilo ME. Impact of nutrition on outcome: a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2005 Aug;27(8):659-68. doi: 10.1002/hed.20221.
    • Isenring EA, Capra S, Bauer JD. Nutrition intervention is beneficial in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the gastrointestinal or head and neck area. Br J Cancer. 2004 Aug 2;91(3):447-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601962.