Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy


2016-05


2018-06


2018-06


40

Study Overview

Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy

Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for a wide array of periampullary and pancreatic diseases including malignant and benign conditions. The outcome of PD has improved over the last two decades due to advances in surgical techniques, anesthesia and perioperative care. Although studies from high volume centers demonstrate reduce in the operative mortality to less than 3%, the postoperative morbidity rate is still ranging from 30% to 60%. Laparoscopic surgery is being used increasingly as a less invasive alternative to traditional interventions for pancreatic resection. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a difficult procedure that has become increasingly popular. Nevertheless, comparative data on outcomes remain limited. In this prospective randomized study, investigators evaluate the safety and feasibility of surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive PD compared to conventional open PD.

Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for a wide array of periampullary and pancreatic diseases including malignant and benign conditions. The outcome of PD has improved over the last two decades due to advances in surgical techniques, anesthesia and perioperative care . Although studies from high volume centers demonstrate reduce in the operative mortality to less than 3%, the postoperative morbidity rate is still ranging from 30% to 60%. Laparoscopic surgery is being used increasingly as a less invasive alternative to traditional interventions for pancreatic resection. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a difficult procedure that has become increasingly popular. Nevertheless, comparative data on outcomes remain limited despite several improvements in surgical devices and techniques that have allowed surgeons to approach the pancreas laparoscopically, laparoscopic PD remains challenging. LPD represents one of the most advanced abdominal operations owing to the necessity of a complex dissection and reconstruction. Recent reports note that complete laparoscopic PD including laparoscopic resection and reconstruction is both technically feasible and safe. In this prospective randomized study, investigators evaluate the safety and feasibility of surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive PD compared to conventional open PD

  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • PROCEDURE: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • PROCEDURE: Open pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • LPD

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2016-06-15  

N/A  

2021-03-02  

2016-06-20  

N/A  

2021-03-03  

2016-06-21  

N/A  

2016-06  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Treatment


Allocation:
Randomized


Interventional Model:
Parallel


Masking:
Double


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy Under general anesthesia, the patient is placed in a supine position with the legs abducted. Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is established using an open technique through a 10-mm trocar over the umbilicus. A 30 telesc

PROCEDURE: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy 1. dissection 2. reconstruction
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Open pancreaticoduodenectomy

Open pancreaticoduodenectomy Abdomen is opened from the Bilateral Subcostal incision. (Chevron's Incision) 2. Abdominal cavity is explored for metastasis especially in liver, base of mesentary, mesocolon and pelvis. Dissection Reconstruction Pancrea

PROCEDURE: Open pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
duration of hospital stayhospital stayone month
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
postoperative pancreatic fistulaPostoperative pancreatic fistula was defined as proposed by the international study group of pancreatic fistula (ISGPF) as any measurable volume of fluid on or after postoperative day (POD) 3 with amylase content greater than 3 times the serum amylase activity, and classified into grades A, B, C .30 days
operative timetotal operative timeintraoperative hours
blood lossestimated blood loss intraoperativeintraoperative hours

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Age from less than 70 years. 2. Tumor size less than or equal 3cm. 3. No vascular invasion.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Multiple prior abdominal surgeries. 2. Body mass index >40. 3. Locally advanced tumors . 4. Inability to withstand prolonged anesthesia. 5. Tumor size more than 3 cm. 6. Patients who received chemoradiotherapy. 7. Pregnant females. 8. Patients with cirrhotic liver.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.


    • STUDY_DIRECTOR: Ayman El Nakeeb, MD, Mansoura University

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    • El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1405-18. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5.
    • El Nakeeb A, Askr W, Mahdy Y, Elgawalby A, El Sorogy M, Abu Zeied M, Abdallah T, Abd Elwahab M. Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, predictors of severity and outcome. A single center experience of 588 cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jun;19(6):1093-100. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2795-2. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
    • Senthilnathan P, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Gul SI, Sabnis S, Natesan AV, Palanisamy NV, Praveen Raj P, Subbiah R, Ramakrishnan P, Palanivelu C. Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Apr;25(4):295-300. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0502. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
    • Dokmak S, Fteriche FS, Aussilhou B, Bensafta Y, Levy P, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.052. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
    • Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):633-8; discussion 638-40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000937.
    • Guerra F, Levi Sandri GB, Amore Bonapasta S, Farsi M, Coratti A. The role of robotics in widening the range of application of minimally invasive surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreatology. 2016 Mar-Apr;16(2):293-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 23. No abstract available.