2021-02
2022-04
2022-07
0
NCT04584775
Medical University of Graz
Medical University of Graz
INTERVENTIONAL
Implementing Acupuncture and Chinese Herbal Medicine Into Palliative Care
In this clinical trial we want to investigate the clinical benefit of a complementary therapy using therapeutical modalities of the traditional chinese medicine in patients suffering from advanced cancer.
After giving informed consent, the participants will be randomized into two groups (1:1). Both groups will receive standard care while one group will additionally be assigned to a practitioner of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) who will deliver a individual treatment according to the needs of the participant (pragmatic approach). Outcome measures will be monitored over the course of eight weeks.
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
---|---|---|
2020-10-06 | N/A | 2024-06-10 |
2020-10-06 | N/A | 2024-06-12 |
2020-10-14 | N/A | 2024-06 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Allocation:
Randomized
Interventional Model:
Parallel
Masking:
None
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Traditional Chinese Medicine plus Standard Care Participants in this group will receive standard Palliative Care and will additionally see a practitioner of Traditional Chinese Medicine. No strict protocol for the actual intervention exists (pragmatic approach). The participants will at least receive a | OTHER: Treatment modalities of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine, Tunia, Chinese dietetics)
OTHER: Standard care
|
OTHER: Standard Care The standard care will include any established medical intervention according to currently available guidelines in palliative care. | OTHER: Treatment modalities of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine, Tunia, Chinese dietetics)
OTHER: Standard care
|
Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline in FACT-G at week 4 | FACT-G ((Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General) is a validated multi-dimensional quality of life (QoL) questionnaire. It consists of 26 items and addresses four dimensions of QoL, including physical wellbeing (PWB), functional wellbeing (FWB), emotional wellbeing (EWB), and social wellbeing (SWB). The scoring system is a five-point Likert scale assessing the QoL of the past seven days. The FACT-G total score has a range of 0-108, whereas higher scores indicate a higher QoL. | Baseline and week 4 |
Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline in FACT-G at week 8 | FACT-G is a validated multi-dimensional quality of life questionnaire. It consists of 26 items and addresses four dimensions of QoL, including physical wellbeing (PWB), functional wellbeing (FWB), emotional wellbeing (EWB), and social wellbeing (SWB). The scoring system is a five-point Likert scale assessing the QoL of the past seven days. The FACT-G total score has a range of 0-108, whereas higher scores indicate a higher QoL. | Baseline and week 8 |
Change from baseline in PHQ-9 at week 4 and 8 | The PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) aims at depressive disorders in medically ill populations. It is a 9-item diagnostic tool based upon the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV) criteria for major depressive disorder. The PHQ-9 score has a range of 0-27, whereas a score above 10 indicates major depression, This questionnaire will also be completed by a close caregiver (family or friend). | Baseline and week 4 and 8 |
Change of symptom burden, assessed by ESAS-R | The ESAS-R (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale revised) was established specifically for palliative care patients and is a nine-item patient-rated symptom visual analog scale. Each item is rated by a numerical rating scale (0-10), whereas higher numbers indicate a more severe symptom experience. The total score of all symptoms represents the total symptom-burden, whereas a higher score indicates a higher total symptom-burden. | Baseline and weekly until week 8 |
Change in use of Pro re nata medication (P.R.N.M.), assessed by Pro re nata medication diary | To assess the use of pro re nata medication, the participants will document their usage in a diary. P.R.N.M. may be antiemetics, analgetics, tranquilizers or any other drug used for acute symptom relieve. | Daily from baseline to week 8 |
Change from baseline in FAMCARE-2 at week 4 and 8 | To evaluate the satisfaction of advanced cancer care in family or friends caregivers, the family satisfaction with end-of-life care two questionnaire (FAMCARE-2) will be used. It is a 17-item assessment tool using a Likert scale (score: 0-68), including subscales for information giving, physical patient care, psychosocial care, and availability of care. A high score on the FAMCARE-2 is associated with a high satisfaction with the palliative care service. This questionnaire will only be completed by a close caregiver (family or friend). | Baseline and week 4 and 8 |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
No publications available