2019-02-15
2022-07-01
2023-07
270
NCT03487016
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
INTERVENTIONAL
First-line Therapy in Metastatic PDAC
The overarching hypothesis of this trial is that the NAPOLI regimen and alternating cycles of NAPOLI and mFOLFOX6 (seq-NAPOLI-FOLFOX) are superior to the current standard of care gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Furthermore, we propose that the NAPOLI regimen and seq-NAPOLI-FOLFOX display favourable safety profiles and allow for longer first line treatment and higher rate of transition into the second line setting.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains an almost uniformly lethal disease. Although there has been significant progress in understanding of the underlying molecular biology of pancreatic cancer, this progress has not translated into substantially better outcome. Alarmingly, the number of pancreatic cancer cases is constantly rising and pancreatic cancer will be the second most frequent cause of cancer related death by 2030. Accordingly, novel therapeutic strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer are desperately needed. Recently, the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel proofed to be superior when compared to single agent gemcitabine (overall survival [OS] 8.7 months in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine group versus 6.6 months in the gemcitabine group; hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.83; P<0.001). Consequently, this combination therapy is now regarded as a standard treatment option for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and should therefore serve as control for future clinical studies. Furthermore, the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) was found to be more effective in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy (overall survival 11.1 month in the FOLFIRINOX group versus 6.8 months in the gemcitabine group - hazard ratio for death, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.73; P<0.001). However, this increased activity came at the cost of higher treatment-related side effects. Recently, the NAPOLI-1 trial yielded promising results for the combination of liposomal irinotecan (nal-Iri) in combination with 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) in patients pretreated with a gemcitabine-based first-line regimen. Finally, Phase II data show promising efficacy and favorable toxicity with conventional FOLFIRI.3 in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, studies in colorectal cancer demonstrated a comparable efficacy and favorable toxicity when comparing conventional FOLFOXIRI (+ bevacizumab) and sequential FOLFOXIRI (alternating FOLFOX and FOLFIRI) in combination with bevacizumab. With these novel treatment options at hand it is imperative to define the optimal first-line treatment modality in order to allow for an optimized treatment sequence to ensure for maximal success with acceptable toxicity.
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
---|---|---|
2018-03-04 | N/A | 2022-09-07 |
2018-04-02 | N/A | 2022-09-08 |
2018-04-03 | N/A | 2022-09 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Allocation:
Randomized
Interventional Model:
Parallel
Masking:
None
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: A: Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel (Standard) Nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, i.v. infusion over about 30 minutes followed by Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 as a 30-minute i.v. infusion on D1, D8, D15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment is given until disease progression or the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. | DRUG: Gemcitabine
DRUG: Nab-paclitaxel
|
EXPERIMENTAL: B: NAPOLI regimen On Day 1 of a 14-day cycle: Liposomal irinotecan 80 mg/m2 i.v. over about 90 minutes followed by Folinic acid 400 mg/m2 i.v. over about 30 minutes followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 i.v. over about 46 h (pump) Treatment is given until disease progression or th | DRUG: 5-FU
DRUG: Irinotecan Liposomal Injection
|
EXPERIMENTAL: C: seq-NAPOLI-FOLFOX The NAPOLI regimen and the mFOLFOX6 regimen are applied in an alternating fashion, starting with the NAPOLI regimen. NAPOLI: On Day 1 of a 14-day cycle: Liposomal irinotecan 80 mg/m2 i.v. over about 90 minutes followed by Folinic acid 400 mg/m2 i.v. ov | DRUG: 5-FU
DRUG: Irinotecan Liposomal Injection
DRUG: Oxaliplatin
|
Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Progression-free survival | PFS | 60 months |
Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall survival | OS | 60 months |
Objective response rate | ORR | 60 months |
Disease control rate | DCR | 60 months |
Duration of study treatment | Time on therapy | 60 months |
Type, incidence, causal relationship and severity of adverse events according to NCI CTCAE version 4.03 | Safety | 60 months |
Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy | Second Line Therapy I Assessed through progression free survival after initiation of second-line therapy. | 60 months |
Choice of second-line chemotherapy | Second Line Therapy II Type of second line therapy will be recorded in a descriptive manner based on available health records. | 60 months |
Duration of second-line chemotherapy | Second Line Therapy III | 60 months |
Quality of life as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 | Quality of life will be assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales ands ingle-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. Scoring is done based on the following document: EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual | 60 months |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
No publications available