Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Endoscopic Biliary Co-axial Stent Placement Plus/Minus Use of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Clearance of Occluded Self Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS) in Patients With Distal Biliary Obstruction From Unresectable Biliary-pancreatic Malignancies


2015-01


2019-11


2019-11


24

Study Overview

Endoscopic Biliary Co-axial Stent Placement Plus/Minus Use of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Clearance of Occluded Self Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS) in Patients With Distal Biliary Obstruction From Unresectable Biliary-pancreatic Malignancies

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects good and/or bad of combining radiofrequency ablation with placement of a second stent, versus a second stent alone. The investigators will also look at the safety of the combination treatment, and see which treatment is better. In either case, the second stent will be placed inside the existing stent as is done in standard practice when treating a blocked stent for the first time.

N/A

  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Unresectable Biliary-pancreatic Malignancies
  • DEVICE: ERCP with SEMS plus radiofrequency ablation
  • DEVICE: ERCP with SEMS alone (standard of care)
  • 14-260

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2015-01-08  

2020-09-28  

2020-09-28  

2015-01-13  

2020-09-28  

2020-10-22  

2015-01-19  

2020-10-22  

2019-12  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Treatment


Allocation:
Randomized


Interventional Model:
Parallel


Masking:
None


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: ERCP with SEMS plus radiofrequency ablation

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) is performed under standard conditions with cannulation of the bile duct, and demonstration on a cholangiogram the location, diameter and length of the biliary stricture. The HabibTM EndoHBP probe (EMcis

DEVICE: ERCP with SEMS plus radiofrequency ablation

ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ERCP with SEMS alone (standard of care)

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) is performed under standard conditions with cannulation of the bile duct, and demonstration on a cholangiogram the location, diameter and length of the biliary stricture. The HabibTM EndoHBP probe (EMcis

DEVICE: ERCP with SEMS alone (standard of care)

Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Rate of Failure180 days
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Rate of Stent Patency1 and 3 months post procedure
Incidence of Procedure Related Complications1 month

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any tumor obstructing the distal bile duct and causing an indwelling biliary SEMS
  • Patients with jaundice or clinical cholangitis, with new elevation of alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and imaging findings supportive of stent occlusion (loss of stent patency, debris within stent, loss of or excessive pneumobilia)
  • Age ≥ 18 years

  • Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have altered gastro-duodenal or hepatobiliary anatomy such that ERCP is felt to be unacceptably technically difficult or unsafe
  • Have additional sites of biliary strictures (intrahepatic/hilar) such that ERCP stenting is felt to be unlikely to provide adequate clinical benefit
  • Have cardiac pacemakers
  • Have Child B/C cirrhosis
  • Are pregnant
  • Are unsuitable for endoscopy (either because of hemodynamic instability, respiratory distress or unsafe hematological parameters such as refractory anemia <7g/dL, thrombocytopenia <50K/mcL, or coagulopathy with INR >2.0)
  • Have biliary strictures not technically amenable to endoscopic therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.


    • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Mark Schattner, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    No publications available