Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Efficacy of NPWT in Reducing the Incidence of Wound Infection After Pancreatic Surgery


2018-07-25


2019-10-10


2019-10-10


100

Study Overview

Efficacy of NPWT in Reducing the Incidence of Wound Infection After Pancreatic Surgery

A disposable negative wound pressure device will be compared to standard sterile wound dressing in reducing the rate of wound infection after clean-contaminated surgical procedures on biliary tract and pancreas in patients at high risk for wound infection.

The use of specific protocols for antisepsis, sterilization and infections' prophylaxis is widely diffused, but, however, surgical site infection rate is still high. Wound infection is often considered as a minor morbidity if compared with other complications, but it is able to considerably increase the length of hospital stay, health care and assistance related costs affecting patients' quality of life. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has published specific guidelines for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention that includes hairs removal, intravenous antibiotics on the basis of the type of procedure planned for that patient, skin antisepsis, surgical team antisepsis, sterility, blood glucose levels control, body temperature control and optimal perfusion of all tissues. At the end of the surgical procedure, surgical incision is covered with a sterile dressing that usually is changed after 24/48 hours. Clean-contaminated procedures like pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), total pancreatectomy (TP) and palliative procedures like gastric by-pass and hepaticojejunostomy GEA/HJ) are considered at high complexity with a high incidence of SSI, especially dealing with patients at high surgical risk. Since from the introduction of negative wound pressure therapy in 1997, these devices have been used only for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds with loss of tissue, but recently have also been proposed in the setting of SSI prevention. Negative wound pressure systems have higher costs, the use in the outpatients setting may be complex consequently the use in the setting of SSI prevention could not result cost-effective. The rationale for the use of negative pressure therapy in the prevention of SSI relies in the complete clearance of dead-space under the incision, fluids and blood removal with consequent reduction of fluids infections, edema reduction, blood flow improvement and tissue oxygenation. Similar results can be obtained through a less expensive, disposable, canisterless, negative pressure wound therapy device (Pico®, Smith&Nephew). This system is cheaper, is portable, and can produce a continue vacuum with a nominal pressure of -80mmHg being able to achieve a rapid discharge at home with less frequent medications, improved comfort and aesthetic result. The following study is designed to assess the effect of a disposable, canisterless, negative pressure wound therapy device in the reduction of SSI in high risk patients if compared with a sterile standard dressing after major pancreatic procedures.

  • Surgical Site Infection
  • DEVICE: Disposable negative wound pressure device (PICO)
  • DEVICE: OPsite post-op visible standard sterile dressing
  • PICO (1215CESC)

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2018-05-15  

N/A  

2020-05-06  

2018-10-05  

N/A  

2020-05-08  

2018-10-09  

N/A  

2020-03  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Prevention


Allocation:
Randomized


Interventional Model:
Parallel


Masking:
None


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Negative wound pressure device (PICO)

The disposable negative wound pressure device (PICO) will be used to cover the midline incision. The dressing is changed on POD3 and removed on POD7. Data are collected on POD3, POD7 and POD30.

DEVICE: Disposable negative wound pressure device (PICO)

  • Application of a disposable negative wound pressure device for surgical site infection prevention.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard sterile dressing

The OPsite post-op visible standard sterile dressing will be used to cover the midline incision. Dressing is changed q48h. Data are collected on POD3, POD7 and POD30.

DEVICE: OPsite post-op visible standard sterile dressing

  • Application of a standard sterile wound dressing.
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Surgical Site Infection (non-organ space)Superficial + deep surgical site infection as defined by CDC30 days from index surgery
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Rate of discontinuation of negative wound pressure therapyDiscontinuation of therapy due to patient choice7 days from index surgery
Incidence of seromasAs defined by CDC30 days from index surgery
Incidence of hematomasAs defined by CDC30 days from index surgery
Incidence of major morbiditiesIncidence of pancreatic fistula, hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, Clavien -Dindo morbidity30 days from index surgery
Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale ScoreThe Stony Brook Evaluation Scale evaluate the aesthetic result of an incision. Score ranges from 0 (worst aesthetic result) to 5 (best aesthetic result)30 days after index surgery

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18
  • Informed consent
  • HPB clean-contaminated procedures (PD, TP and GEA/HJ)
  • Median laparotomy
  • Compliance with a follow-up protocol
  • High risk for SSI (at least one of the following):


  • Body Mass Index > 30kg/m2
  • Diabetes mellitus type I or II
  • Use of steroids
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • ASA ≥ 3
  • Charlson Comorbidity Index 1
  • Time of surgery > 360'
  • Estimated blood loss > 1L

  • Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous open surgery of the abdomen
  • Unable to give informed consent

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

  • Smith & Nephew Wound Management Inc

  • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Luca Landoni, MD, AOVR Veneto

Publications

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Fiorio M, Marvaso A, Vigano F, Marchetti F. Incidence of surgical site infections in general surgery in Italy. Infection. 2006 Dec;34(6):310-4. doi: 10.1007/s15010-006-6632-0.
  • Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):228-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
  • Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;20(4):250-78; quiz 279-80. doi: 10.1086/501620. No abstract available.
  • Ceppa EP, Pitt HA, House MG, Kilbane EM, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, Zyromski NJ, Lillemoe KD. Reducing surgical site infections in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2013 May;15(5):384-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00604.x. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
  • Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;38(6):563-76; discussion 577.
  • Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;38(6):553-62. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199706000-00001.
  • Masden D, Goldstein J, Endara M, Xu K, Steinberg J, Attinger C. Negative pressure wound therapy for at-risk surgical closures in patients with multiple comorbidities: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1043-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182501bae.
  • Vargo D. Negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of wound infection in high risk abdominal wound closures. Am J Surg. 2012 Dec;204(6):1021-3; discussion 1023-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.004.
  • Blackham AU, Farrah JP, McCoy TP, Schmidt BS, Shen P. Prevention of surgical site infections in high-risk patients with laparotomy incisions using negative-pressure therapy. Am J Surg. 2013 Jun;205(6):647-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.06.007. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
  • Bonds AM, Novick TK, Dietert JB, Araghizadeh FY, Olson CH. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy significantly reduces surgical site infection in open colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Dec;56(12):1403-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a39959.
  • Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Muller P, Stein J, Hetzer R. Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
  • Webster J, Scuffham P, Sherriff KL, Stankiewicz M, Chaboyer WP. Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub2.
  • Malmsjo M, Huddleston E, Martin R. Biological effects of a disposable, canisterless negative pressure wound therapy system. Eplasty. 2014 Apr 2;14:e15. eCollection 2014.
  • Fong ZV, McMillan MT, Marchegiani G, Sahora K, Malleo G, De Pastena M, Loehrer AP, Lee GC, Ferrone CR, Chang DC, Hutter MM, Drebin JA, Bassi C, Lillemoe KD, Vollmer CM, Fernandez-Del Castillo C. Discordance Between Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Wound Infection Cultures in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg. 2016 May 1;151(5):432-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4510.
  • Payne C, Edwards D. Application of the Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device (PICO) on a Heterogeneous Group of Surgical and Traumatic Wounds. Eplasty. 2014 Apr 28;14:e20. eCollection 2014.
  • Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control. 1992 Oct;20(5):271-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80201-9. No abstract available.
  • Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001.
  • Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):761-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005.
  • Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.
  • Singer AJ, Arora B, Dagum A, Valentine S, Hollander JE. Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7):1892-1897. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000287275.15511.10.
  • Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G, Campitiello F, Selvaggi F, Canonico S. Effects of a new pocket device for negative pressure wound therapy on surgical wounds of patients affected with Crohn's disease: a pilot trial. Surg Innov. 2014 Apr;21(2):204-12. doi: 10.1177/1553350613496906. Epub 2013 Jul 24.