2013-01
2015-01
2015-01
121
NCT01936467
Johns Hopkins University
Johns Hopkins University
INTERVENTIONAL
Comparison of Two Needle Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
The aim of this study is to compare Endoscopic Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspirate with a standard 22-gauge needle using either "standard-suction" or ⋊pillary suction" methods for solid pancreatic lesions. Investigators hope to discover the best technique for obtaining diagnostic material when patients with a pancreatic mass undergo endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspirate procedure. There are currently several techniques for obtaining tissue during endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspirate. The procedure will be performed by either the capillary suction technique or no suction technique.
N/A
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
---|---|---|
2013-08-29 | 2016-08-20 | 2017-03-02 |
2013-09-03 | 2017-03-02 | 2017-04-13 |
2013-09-06 | 2017-04-13 | 2017-03 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Allocation:
Randomized
Interventional Model:
Parallel
Masking:
Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Standard suction These are patients who will have endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using the standard suction FNA technique: 15 to-and-fro movements within the lesion will be performed with use of 10cc suction syringe. | DEVICE: Standard technique EUS-FNA
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Capillary suction These are patients who will have endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using the capillary suction FNA technique: 15 to-and-fro movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by pulling the | DEVICE: Capillary suction technique for EUS FNA
|
Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Diagnostic Yield of Capillary Technique | Diagnostic yield is defined as percentage of specimens in which diagnostic material is obtained. | up to 6 months |
Diagnostic Yield of Standard Technique | Diagnostic yield is defined as percentage of specimens in which diagnostic material is obtained. | up to 6 months |
Sensitivity of EUS-FNA With Capillary Technique | Sensitivity of the EUS-FNA with Capillary technique | 6 months |
Sensitivity of EUS-FNA With StandardTechnique | Sensitivity of the EUS-FNA with Capillary technique | 6 months |
Sensitivity of EUS-FNA | Comparison of EUS-FNA sensitivity using Capillary technique versus Standard technique for pancreatic solid lesions | 6 months |
Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
First Pass Diagnostic Rate | The rate of aquiring diagnostic pancreatic mass tissue with first FNA pass | immediate |
Acquisition of Core Tissue | The rate of acquiring core tissue of the pancreatic mass through EUS-FNA | immediate |
Diagnostic Accuracy of EUS-FNA | The proportion of subjects without the disease with negative EUS-FNA in total of subjects without the disease | 6 months |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications