- About Pancreatic Cancer
- Get Support
Caregivers
- Get Involved
- Events
- More
2025-06-01
2028-06-01
2030-06-01
856
NCT06966440
Ruijin Hospital
Ruijin Hospital
INTERVENTIONAL
Adjuvant Pancreatic Therapy Guided by MRD
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although surgical resection can be curative, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate after resection alone is approximately 20%. Adjuvant chemotherapy can improve survival outcomes in patients with resected PAAD. This study will explore the application of ctDNA MRD in guiding adjuvant therapy in these patients. This prospective, randomized, interventional trial will evaluate a ct-DNA MRD-guided adjuvant therapy strategy in PAAD patients who have undergone radical resection at our institution. Prior to adjuvant chemotherapy, patients will be randomized (1:1) to either the experimental arm (Arm A) or the control arm (Arm B). Arm A will receive ct-DNA MRD-guided therapy, while Arm B will receive non-ctDNA-driven standard of care post-operative adjuvant therapy. In Arm A, patients will receive a physician-selected, guideline-recommended adjuvant therapy regimen in 12-week cycles. ctDNA MRD will be assessed before the end of first cycle and at weeks 8 and 11. If two consecutive post-treatment MRD tests are negative, therapy will be ⋞-escalated" (discontinued) with regular follow-up as determined by the clinician. Otherwise, another treatment cycle will be administered, with the same MRD assessment. Following the second cycle, patients without two negative MRD results (only tested at week 8 and week 11 within each cycle) will Ȯscalate" to a longer duration of chemotherapy (comparing to the 6-month standard of care) at the clinician's discretion. Treatment will continue until disease progression, intolerance, or study termination. Arm B will receive standard post-operative adjuvant therapy for a duration recommended by CSCO guidelines (typically 6 months), followed by regular follow-up every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint is to compare the prognosis, tolerability, and treatment completion rates between the two arms.
In pancreatic cancer, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) carries tumor-specific mutations (e.g., KRAS, TP53), which can be tracked using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) after surgery. Previous observational studies suggest that ctDNA-positive patients have a significantly higher risk of postoperative recurrence. In the MRD window (2-12 weeks post-surgery), the median disease-free survival (DFS) for ctDNA-positive patients was only 6.37 months, compared to 33.31 months for ctDNA-negative patients (HR=5.45), indicating that ctDNA-positive patients may require intensified treatment. Furthermore, patients with persistent ctDNA positivity after completing adjuvant chemotherapy (e.g., gemcitabine) still have a high recurrence rate (70%-90%), suggesting the need for alternative treatment strategies. In a previous study (NCT05479708) evaluating postoperative MRD detection using plasma ctDNA to assess survival benefits and optimize adjuvant chemotherapy strategies in resectable pancreatic cancer patients, we found that MRD-positive patients at 4-8 weeks post-surgery (Landmark MRD) had a higher risk of recurrence. Analysis from Landmark MRD to 36 weeks post-treatment showed that patients who converted from positive to negative MRD status (MRD clearance) had a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared to those who remained positive and those who converted from negative to positive, and MRD clearance was associated with significantly improved overall survival (OS). Given the significant trauma of pancreatic surgery and the often poor postoperative physical condition of patients, the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (single-agent/combination, duration, initiation time, etc.) that balances patient recovery and recurrence control remains unclear. Serum biomarker CA 19-9 is commonly used to assess prognosis in pancreatic cancer but is not a reliable predictor of adjuvant therapy efficacy. Imaging methods such as CT/MRI are often used to assess residual tumor or recurrence risk, but their sensitivity and specificity are limited, making it difficult to accurately evaluate real-time tumor burden. Therefore, we designed a prospective, randomized, interventional clinical trial based on ctDNA MRD to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in patients with radically resected pancreatic cancer. The aim is to evaluate whether a ctDNA-guided treatment approach can reduce the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in low-risk patients without increasing recurrence risk, while intensifying treatment in high-risk patients to improve prognosis. A ctDNA MRD-guided adjuvant therapy approach can allow patients to receive individualized adjuvant treatment. When ctDNA MRD test results are negative, adjuvant chemotherapy can be stopped with active follow-up. This can ensure that clinical benefits are not compromised while avoiding unnecessary chemotherapy. In cases where ctDNA MRD remains positive, continuing treatment can provide patients with more intensive therapy and potentially lead to better prognoses.
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
| Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
|---|---|---|
2025-04-21 | N/A | 2025-07-09 |
2025-05-07 | N/A | 2025-07-15 |
2025-05-11 | N/A | 2025-07 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Allocation:
Randomized
Interventional Model:
Parallel
Masking:
None
Arms and Interventions
| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| EXPERIMENTAL: Arm A: MRD-guided adjuvant treatment In the experimental group, patients will receive a guideline-recommended adjuvant therapy regimen chosen by their physician, with each treatment cycle lasting 12 weeks. MRD testing will be performed before the start of the first treatment cycle, and at we | DIAGNOSTIC_TEST: circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based MRD
DRUG: adjuvant chemotherapy regimens
|
| PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Arm B: non-MRD-driven, standard of care adjuvant treatment The control group will receive standard post-operative adjuvant therapy (according to CSCO guideline-recommended treatment duration, generally 6 months) followed by regular follow-up (every 8 weeks). | DRUG: adjuvant chemotherapy regimens
|
| Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease free survival (DFS) | To evaluate the impact of ct-DNA MRD-guided adjuvant therapy on disease-free survival (DFS), defined as the proportion of patients alive without objectively documented disease progression from the time of randomization until the 36th month. | From the time of randomization up to three years |
| Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival (OS) | To evaluate the impact of ct-DNA MRD-guided adjuvant therapy on overall survival (OS), defined as the proportion of patients alive from the time of randomization until the 36th month (3-year OS rate) or until the 60th month(5-years OS rate). | From the time of randomization until the 36th month (3-year OS rate) or until the 60th month(5-years OS rate) |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy completion rate | Adjuvant chemotherapy completion rate, defined in the experimental group (arm A) as the proportion of patients completing 1-cycle, 2-cycle, 3-cycle, or 4-cycle treatment based on MRD results (each cycle is about 12 weeks), and in the control group (arm B) as the proportion of patients completing the prescribed chemotherapy duration (generally 2-cycle treatment, about 24 weeks). | From the time of randomization to the end of treatment (arm A: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks, or 48 weeks; arm B: 24 weeks) |
| Adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) rates | Incidence of AE and SAE assessed via NCI CTCAE version 5.0 in the two treatment modalities. Definition of AE Possible adverse events include: drug-related peripheral sensory neuropathy, diarrhea, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome; as well as puncture site infections related to blood draws during the trial. Definition of SAE Possible serious adverse events include: 1. Death of the patient; 2. Life-threatening adverse events, such as Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity or Grade 4 hematologic toxicity accompanied by fever and bleeding; 3. Any adverse event requiring hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; 4. Irreversible adverse events; 5. Unexpected adverse events not listed in the drug label that may impact the continuation of the study. | From the time of randomization until the date of first recorded adverse events or serious adverse events as mentioned above, assessed up to 60 months (5-years) |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
|
Study Contact Name: Baiyong Shen, Dr Phone Number: 008613901943778 Email: shenby@shsmu.edu.cn |
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
