2017-08-28
2023-02-13
2023-02-14
315
NCT03207867
Novartis
Novartis
INTERVENTIONAL
A Phase 2 Study of NIR178 in Combination With PDR001 in Patients With Solid Tumors and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
The purpose of this phase 2 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NIR178 in combination with PDR001 in multiple solid tumors and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and further explore schedule variations of NIR178 to optimize immune activation through inhibition of A2aR.
This is an open-label multi-part, phase II study evaluating the combination of NIR178 and PDR001 in patients with advanced solid tumors and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The study has three parts: * Part 1: Multi-arm Bayesian adaptive signal finding design in solid tumors and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with continuous dosing of NIR178 in combination with PDR001. * Part 2: Exploration of continuous and intermittent NIR178 schedules in combination with PDR001 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). * Part 3: Further evaluation of optimal intermittent or continuous schedule of NIR178 in combination with PDR001 (if selected based on results of Part 2). As of protocol amendment 6, Part 3 explored the safety and pharmacokinetics of the film-coated tablet (FCT) formulation of NIR178 continuous dosing in combination with PDR001 in tiple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. In addition, a separate safety run-in part was conducted in Japan in order to adequately characterize the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of NIR178 as a single-agent and in combination with PDR001. Patients enrolled in this study received NIR178 either twice daily (BID) continuously or based on the assigned intermittent schedule within 60 minutes prior to PDR001 infusion. PDR001 400 mg was administered via IV infusion over 30 minutes once every 4 weeks. Each treatment cycle was 28 days. Patients enrolled in the Japanese safety run-in part received NIR178 as single agent for the first cycle (28 days). If the patients completed Cycle 1 without experiencing dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), they initiated combination therapy with PDR001 starting Cycle 2 onwards, and continued at the same dose of NIR178. An additional cohort in the Japanese safety run-in part of the study received NIR178 in combination with PDR001 starting with Cycle 1. If the patients complete Cycle 1 without experiencing DLTs, they continued to receive combination treatment. Patients received treatment with the combination until disease progression (assessed by investigator per immune-related response criteria (iRECIST) or Cheson 2014), unacceptable toxicity, death or discontinuation from study treatment for any other reason (e.g., withdrawal of consent, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy or at the discretion of the investigator), otherwise known as End of Treatment.
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
---|---|---|
2017-06-19 | 2024-02-05 | 2024-10-07 |
2017-06-30 | 2024-02-05 | 2024-10-09 |
2017-07-05 | 2024-03-01 | 2024-10 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Allocation:
Non Randomized
Interventional Model:
Parallel
Masking:
None
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: NIR178 + PDR001 Part 1: NIR178 continuously in combination with PDR001 400mg every 4 weeks. The part 1 enrolled 9 different tumor types. | DRUG: NIR178
DRUG: PDR001
|
EXPERIMENTAL: NIR178 BID Intermittent + PDR001 Part 2: Three different dosing schedules of NIR178 twice daily (BID) including continuous and two intermittent in combination with PDR001 | DRUG: NIR178
DRUG: PDR001
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Part 3 Further evaluation of optimal intermittent or continuous schedule of NIR178 in combination with PDR001 (if selected based on results of Part 2). A film-coated tablet of NIR178 was assessed. | DRUG: NIR178
DRUG: PDR001
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Japanese safety run-in part Different dosing schedules of NIR178 were explored. | DRUG: NIR178
DRUG: PDR001
|
Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. | Up to 3.9 years |
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL | ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). For Cheson 2014 criteria, CR= Target nodes/nodal masses must regress to ≤1.5 cm in longest diameter (LDi), no extralymphatic sites of disease, absent non-measured lesions, organ enlargement regress to normal, no new lesions, and bone marrow normal by morphology (if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry negative); PR= ≥50% decrease in the sum of the product of the perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes, absent or regressed non-measured lesions, spleen must have regressed by >50% in length beyond normal, and no new lesions. | Up to 2.5 years |
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. | Up to 4.7 years |
Part 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. | Up to 0.5 years |
Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST). | Up to 3.9 years |
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST). | Up to 4.7 years |
Part 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST). | Up to 0.5 years |
Part 1: Mean Percentage Change in PSA From Baseline | Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were assessed in serum. Rising PSA is generally a manifestation of progression of prostate cancer. | Baseline, up to 0.8 years |
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. | Up to 3.9 years |
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST). | Up to 3.9 years |
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL | DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). | Up to 2.5 years |
Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. | Up to 4.7 years |
Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST). | Up to 4.7 years |
Part 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. | Up to 0.5 years |
Part 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST). | Up to 0.5 years |
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 3.9 years |
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 3.9 years |
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL | DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for DLBCL. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 2.5 years |
Part 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 4.7 years |
Part 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 4.7 years |
Part 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 0.5 years |
Part 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 0.5 years |
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 3.9 years |
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 3.9 years |
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL | PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 2.5 years |
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 4.7 years |
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 4.7 years |
Part 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors | PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 0.5 years |
Part 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors | PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | Up to 0.5 years |
Part 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS) | OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan (SAP). | 2 years |
Part 2: 2-year Overall Survival (OS) | OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | 2 years |
Part 3: 2-year Overall Survival (OS) | OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan. | 2 years |
Part 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue | The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy. | Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days. |
Part 2: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue | The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy. | Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days. |
Part 3: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue | The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy. | Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days. |
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period | Number of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration. | Up to 4 years (Part 1), 4.8 years (Part 2) and 0.6 years (Part 3) |
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178 | Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of NIR178 and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of NIR178. Dose or schedule adjustments were permitted for patients who did not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule. | Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3) |
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001 | Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of PDR001 and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of PDR001. Dose or schedule adjustments were permitted for patients who did not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule. Dose reductions were not permitted for PDR001. | Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3) |
Part 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178 | Dose intensity of NIR178 was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days. | Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3) |
Part 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001 | Dose intensity of PDR001 was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 28 days. | Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3) |
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 Antibodies | PDR001 immunogenicity was evaluated in serum samples. Patient anti-drug antibodies (ADA) status was defined as follows: * ADA-negative at baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline * ADA-positive at baseline: ADA-positive sample at baseline * ADA-negative post-baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples * Treatment-reduced ADA-positive: ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples * Treatment-induced ADA-positive: ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-induced ADA-positive sample * Treatment-boosted ADA-positive: ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-boosted ADA-positive sample * ADA-inconclusive: patient who does not qualify for any of the above definitions or a patient for which the baseline sample is missing | Up to approximately 5 years |
Japan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 assessed as unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness or concomitant medications, which occurs within the first 28 days of treatment with NIR178 as single agent or in combination with PDR001 during the Japan safety run-in part of the study. Other clinically significant toxicities may be considered to be DLTs, even if not CTCAE grade 3 or higher. | 28 days |
Japan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period | Number of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration. | Up to 0.7 years |
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178 | Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration following a dose. | Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days |
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178 | Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. | Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days |
All Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178 | PK parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-12hr calculation. | Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days |
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite) | NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. PK parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration following a dose. | Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days |
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite) | NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. | Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days |
All Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite) | NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. PK parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-12hr calculation. | Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days |
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PDR001 | PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose. | First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days |
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of PDR001 | PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. | First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days |
All Study Parts: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 28 Days Post Dose (AUC0-28day) of PDR001 | PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-28day calculation. | First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
No publications available
NPCF was founded on May 29, 2009 and is a 501(c)(3) organization. All donations are tax deductible.
The information and services provided by the National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation are for informational purposes only. The information and services are not intended to be substitutes for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. The National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation does not recommend nor endorse any specific physicians, products or treatments even though they may be mentioned on this site.