- About Pancreatic Cancer
- Get Support
Caregivers
- Get Involved
- Events
- More
2012-01-30
2017-07-06
2017-07-06
60
NCT01598194
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
INTERVENTIONAL
Comparison of a Novel 22-gauge Core Biopsy Needle
The goal of this clinical research study is to compare the performance of a newly available needle with reverse bevel design (called the EchoTip® Procore™ needle) with standard needles to see which needle gives better diagnostic information for pancreatic lesions.
An endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle biopsy or FNA is a special endoscopic procedure used to sample lesions within or next to the digestive tract, including the pancreas. The needle is used to collect material for diagnosis. A special lighted, flexible tube called an endoscope is inserted through the mouth, into the stomach and small intestine. The endoscope also has an ultrasound probe at its tip which can be used to see the pancreas, which is located behind the stomach. The doctor will then use the ultrasound to guide the needle biopsy or FNA. In this procedure, an average of 4 needle passes (needle sticks) is needed to collect enough tissue for diagnosis. However, the number of passes can be higher or lower, depending on the individual lesion and success of the needle passes. If participant agrees to take part in this study, 2 different needles (the standard straight hollow-core needle and the new EchoTip® Procore™ needle) will be used to sample the pancreas lesion. Two (2) passes will be performed with each needle type and compared. If additional passes are needed for diagnosis, they will not be included in this study. After the first set of needle passes, the doctor may decide that more passes are needed. Final test results will be taken from the diagnostic results from each needle pass. The results from both types of the needle will be included in the participant's medical record. This is an investigational study. All needles used in this study are FDA approved and commercially available. Comparing the needles is investigational. Up to 60 participants will take part in this study. All will be enrolled at MD Anderson.
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
| Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
|---|---|---|
2012-05-11 | 2018-03-19 | 2018-12-05 |
2012-05-14 | 2018-12-05 | 2018-12-27 |
2012-05-15 | 2018-12-27 | 2018-12 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Allocation:
Na
Interventional Model:
Single Group
Masking:
None
Arms and Interventions
| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| EXPERIMENTAL: Novel 22-gauge Core Biopsy Needle Standard Biopsy Needle The 22-gauge core biopsy needle with reverse bevel design (EchoTip® Procore™) will be compared prospectively to the standard straight hollow-core 22-gauge or 25-gauge FNA needle already used in our clinical practice for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic l | DEVICE: Novel 22-gauge Core Biopsy Needle + Standard Biopsy Needle
|
| Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Diagnostic Adequacy Scores With SST vs. CST for Cytologic Diagnosis Using a 22G Core Needle. | The main outcome measure of the study was the diagnostic adequacy of the 22Gpc using SST and CST. The cytologic diagnostic adequacy of 22Gpc was also compared to the standard 25 G needle. Each participant underwent 4 study passes, 2 passes with a standard 25 G needle using SST, plus a random assignment to one of two groups for 2 passes with the 22Gpc (1 pass for cytologic and 1 pass for histologic analysis) using SST (group 1) or CST (group 2). Diagnostic adequacy was defined as the ability to procure cytological aspirates or histological core tissue samples that were sufficient for diagnostic interpretation. | Each EGD EUS-FNA endoscopy procedure takes about 1 hour. Each needle pass takes about 1-2 minutes. |
| Comparison of Diagnostic Adequacy Scores With SST vs. CST for Histologic Diagnosis Using a 22G Core Needle. | The main outcome measure of the study was the diagnostic adequacy of the 22Gpc using SST versus CST on EUS-FNA. The cytologic diagnostic adequacy of 22Gpc was also compared to the standard 25G needle. Diagnostic adequacy was defined as the ability to procure cytological aspirates or histological core tissue samples that were sufficient for diagnostic interpretation. Two cytopathologists, blinded to needle type and technique, reviewed and graded all the study slides. Cytologic diagnostic adequacy of each pass was graded on a semiquantitative scale from 0 to 3 based on sample cellularity. A score of 2 (estimated cell count > 500 cells) or 3 (estimated cell count > 1000 cells) was considered adequate for diagnosis; a score of 3 was most desirable. A score < 2 was considered inadequate. Histologic diagnostic adequacy was graded as either an adequate (score 2 or 3) or inadequate specimen for diagnosis. | Each EGD EUS-FNA endoscopy procedure takes about 1 hour. Each needle pass takes about 1-2 minutes |
| Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Diagnostic Adequacy of Single Pass With 22G Core Needle and Standard 25G Needle for Cytologic Diagnosis | The cytologic diagnostic adequacy of 22Gpc was compared to the standard 25G needle. Diagnostic adequacy was defined as the ability to procure cytological aspirates that were sufficient for diagnostic interpretation. Two cytopathologists, blinded to needle type and technique, reviewed and graded all the study slides. Cytologic diagnostic adequacy of each pass was graded on a semiquantitative scale from 0 to 3 based on sample cellularity. A score of 2 (estimated cell count > 500 cells) or 3 (estimated cell count > 1000 cells) was considered adequate for diagnosis; a score of 3 was most desirable. A score < 2 was considered inadequate. | Each EGD EUS-FNA endoscopy procedure takes about 1 hour. Each needle pass takes about 1-2 minutes |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
