Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Lumen Apposing Metal Stents vs Lumen Apposing Metal Stent Plus Double Pigtail Stent for Endoscopic Drainage


2017-11-06


2019-12-31


2019-12-31


2

Study Overview

Lumen Apposing Metal Stents vs Lumen Apposing Metal Stent Plus Double Pigtail Stent for Endoscopic Drainage

The study hypothesis is that placement of LAMS plus an overlapping double pigtail stent for endoscopic transmural drainage of PFCs with solid debris will result in improved drainage and require fewer endoscopic interventions compared to placement of LAMS alone.

The study hypothesis is that placement of LAMS plus an overlapping double pigtail stent for endoscopic transmural drainage of PFCs with solid debris will result in improved drainage and require fewer endoscopic interventions compared to placement of LAMS alone. Adult patients with symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections who are scheduled to undergo EUS-guided drainage of PFCs with LAMS placement will be eligible for study participation. The initial portion of this procedure consists of diagnostic EUS for imaging and assessment of the PFC. This EUS examination is able to distinguish the relative liquid and solid components of PFCs, detail which may not be evident by CT imaging. Adult patients with PFCs consisting of >30% solid component as assessed at the time of EUS will be eligible for randomization. This threshold was selected as the enrollment criteria in order to select patients with a significant solid necrotic component to the lesion, as prior study of patients undergoing LAMS placement for drainage of PFCs have used >70% fluid content as the definition for a PFC with predominantly liquid contents. Allocation to study arm will be determined by the contents of sealed envelope. Subjects randomized to LAMS alone will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of an Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter. The choice of transgastric or transduodenal LAMS placement will be at the discretion of the endoscopist and contingent upon PFC location and window relative to the EUS transducer. Subjects randomized to LAMS plus double pigtail stent will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of a single Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter; following this, wire access across the stent lumen will be achieved using a 0.035 inch hydrophilic guidewire, and a double pigtail plastic biliary stent (6 French, 7 French, or 10 French at the discretion of the endoscopist) will be deployed over the wire. The use of fluoroscopy for stent deployment will be at the discretion of the endoscopist. The primary end point: Greater than 50% decrease in size of PFC (in mm), compared to pre-intervention size (in mm), on cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging at 30 days following stent placement. This was selected as the primary outcome in order to maintain consistency with the primary outcomes of a prior multicenter study of LAMS placement for PFCs.

  • Pancreatic Pseudocyst
  • DEVICE: Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS)
  • DEVICE: LAMS plus double pigtail stent
  • 170247

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2017-02-07  

2021-06-08  

2021-08-18  

2017-02-07  

2021-08-18  

2021-08-19  

2017-02-09  

2021-08-19  

2021-08  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Treatment


Allocation:
Randomized


Interventional Model:
Parallel


Masking:
None


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS)

Subjects randomized to LAMS alone will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of an Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter.

DEVICE: Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS)

  • The AXIOS Stent and Electrocautery-Enhanced Delivery System is an endoscopic device designed to enable the ultrasound trained interventional endoscopist to deliver a transenteric stent between the gastrointestinal tract and a pancreatic pseudocyst.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: LAMS plus double pigtail stent

Subjects randomized to LAMS plus double pigtail stent will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of a single Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter. Following this, wire access across the stent lumen will be achieved using a 0.035 inch hydrophilic gu

DEVICE: LAMS plus double pigtail stent

  • The AXIOS Stent and Electrocautery-Enhanced Delivery System is an endoscopic device designed to enable the ultrasound trained interventional endoscopist to deliver a transenteric stent between the gastrointestinal tract and a pancreatic pseudocyst. The do
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Decrease in Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC)Greater than 50% decrease in size of PFC (in mm) compared to pre-intervention size (in mm) as measured on cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging30 days following placement of stent
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Clinical Success Rate for Draining of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC)Clinical success for drainage of PFC, defined as complete resolution of PFC on follow-up computed tomography (CT) imaging and stent removal within 3 months3 months
Number of Endoscopic Interventions Required for Resolution of PFC Prior to Stent RemovalNumber of endoscopic interventions required for resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) prior to stent removal3 months
Incidence of Hospital Readmissions Following Initial Endoscopic Intervention and Prior to Resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection Stent RemovalIncidence of hospital readmissions following initial endoscopic intervention and prior to resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) stent removal3 months
Incidence of Surgical or Percutaneous Radiologic Intervention for PFC Following Initial Endoscopy InterventionIncidence of surgical or percutaneous radiologic intervention for Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) following initial endoscopy intervention3 months
Incidence of Early (<30 Days) Endoscopic ReinterventionIncidence of early (<30 days) endoscopic reintervention following initial endoscopic intervention30 days

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and Female patients between the ages of 18 and 80
  • Must be presenting with symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections
  • Scheduled to undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of PFCs with LAMS placement at Vanderbilt Medical Center as part of routine care
  • Willing and able to give informed consent

  • Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling/unable to give informed consent
  • Patients with PFCs consisting of < 30% solid component as assessed at the time of EUS

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.


    • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Patrick Yachimski, MD, MPH, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    No publications available