2009-09-03
2012-12-09
2013-01-31
118
NCT01064622
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
INTERVENTIONAL
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride With or Without Vismodegib in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
This randomized phase I/II trial studies gemcitabine hydrochloride and vismodegib to see how well they work compared with gemcitabine hydrochloride alone in treating patients with recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Vismodegib may slow the growth of tumor cells. It is not yet known whether giving gemcitabine hydrochloride together with vismodegib is more effective than gemcitabine hydrochloride alone in treating patients with pancreatic cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: l. To compare the progression-free survival of advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with the combination of gemcitabine plus GDC-0449 (vismodegib) versus gemcitabine plus placebo. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival of advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with the combination of gemcitabine plus GDC-0449 versus gemcitabine plus placebo. II. To compare the objective response rate of advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with the combination of gemcitabine plus GDC-0449 versus gemcitabine alone. III. To determine the toxicity experienced by pancreatic cancer patients treated with the combination of gemcitabine plus GDC-0449. IV. To determine the activity, in an exploratory analysis, of gemcitabine plus GDC-0449 in patients who progress on gemcitabine plus placebo. TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if tumor immunohistochemical expression patterns of proteins in the Hh pathway, including sonic hedgehog (Shh), indian hedgehog (Ihh), patched tumor suppressor gene (PTCH), smoothened protein (SMO), and GLI1 and 2, within pancreatic tissue obtained at the time of curative intent surgery predict response and prognosticate outcome of patients treated with or without GDC-0449 at the time of relapse. II. To determine the prognostic ability (relapse free survival, [RFS]) of these biologic markers for resected patients in an archival cohort of patients undergoing resection. III. To determine expression pattern of pancreatic CSC markers, including CD44, CD24, CD133, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) and epithelial specific antigen (ESA) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on these archival tissues in relation to Hh pathway markers and correlate these with clinical outcomes. IV. To determine whether high baseline serum Shh, as well as changes in serum Shh during treatment, predict treatment efficacy and/or prognosticate clinical outcome. V. To determine the frequency of mutation of Hh pathway genes, PTCH, SMO, SuFU, and if the presence or absence of mutations are correlated with clinical outcome. VI. To determine the frequency of amplification of Hh pathway genes, gene copy number by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of GLI1 and SMO in those tumors that have high protein expression as seen by IHC. Gene amplification will be correlated with clinical outcome. VII. To determine if there is a correlation of K-ras mutation, and MET and RON expression, amplification, or mutation status with Hh pathway abnormalities, CSC markers, and clinical outcomes. VIII. To determine if baseline contrast perfusion imaging volume transfer constant (Ktrans) within primary and liver metastatic lesions as measured on a 256-detector computed tomography (CT) scanner predicts objective response rates, and other clinical endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS), to treatment with gemcitabine and GDC-0449/placebo. (University of Chicago ONLY) IX. To determine if treatment with Gemcitabine and GDC-0449 improves tumor perfusion, as measured by Ktrans, over the course of treatment by serial CT scans every 2 cycles, compared to tumors treated with Gemcitabine and placebo. (University of Chicago ONLY) X. To determine if improved tumor perfusion with GDC-0449 treatment (if observed) improves objective response rates and other clinical endpoints including PFS. (University of Chicago ONLY) OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, safety lead-in study (part I) followed by a randomized study (part II). An initial 6 patients are enrolled in the part I portion of the study. If no dose-limiting toxicities occur in these patients, subsequent patients are enrolled in the part II portion of the study. PART I (safety lead-in study): Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and hedgehog antagonist GDC-0449 orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PART II (randomized study): Patients are stratified according to disease status (recurrent after surgery vs metastatic) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 vs 1). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride 1000 mg/m^2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and placebo PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. At the time of disease progression, patients are unblinded and may crossover to arm II. ARM II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride 1000 mg/m^2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and hedgehog antagonist GDC-0449 PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor tissue, blood, serum, and plasma samples are collected periodically for biomarker and other analyses. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically.
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
---|---|---|
2010-02-05 | 2015-01-29 | 2024-10-28 |
2010-02-05 | 2015-01-29 | 2024-11-19 |
2010-02-08 | 2015-02-13 | 2017-10 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Allocation:
Randomized
Interventional Model:
Parallel
Masking:
Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arm I (gemcitabine hydrochloride and placebo) Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and placebo PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. At the time of disease progression, patients ar | DRUG: Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
OTHER: Hydrocortisone/Placebo
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm II (gemcitabine hydrochloride and vismodegib) Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and vismodegib PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | DRUG: Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
DRUG: Vismodegib
|
Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Progression-free Survival | Time from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause. Estimated in the two treatment groups by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a stratified logrank test. | Up to 3 years |
Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall Survival | Time from randomization to death from any cause. Estimated in the two treatment groups by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a stratified logrank test. | Up to 3 years |
Objective Response Rate | Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. | Up to 6 months |
Incidence of Adverse Events | Details are provided in Adverse Events section below. Reported here are percentage of patients in each arm with any grade 1 or higher adverse event, regardless of attribution. | Up to 3 years |
Activity (Overall Response Rate) in Crossover Patients | RECIST response rate in patients after crossover from placebo to vismodegib arm. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. | Up to 6 months |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications