Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Genetic Testing for Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate Cancers


2020-12-01


2023-12-31


2023-12-31


269

Study Overview

Genetic Testing for Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate Cancers

This study is evaluating the effect of two pre-test education methods on participants interested in genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effect of two pre-test education methods on the level of participation in genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk. A prospective study examines outcomes before the development of a disease. * The research study procedures include screening for eligibility, randomization and a series of questionnaires. * Participants will be randomized, or assigned by chance, to one of two methods of pre-genetic test education and after completing either pre-test education participants will be offered the opportunity to have genetic testing performed Two methods of pre-genetic test education: * video education * in-person counseling * Genetic testing will be performed by blood draw. * It is expected that 500 people will participate in this study * Participants will be in the research study for up to 5 yrs after enrollment

  • Breast Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • BEHAVIORAL: Standard Genetic Counseling
  • BEHAVIORAL: Educational Video
  • 19-652

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2020-03-17  

N/A  

2024-01-18  

2020-03-30  

N/A  

2024-01-19  

2020-04-01  

N/A  

2024-01  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research


Allocation:
Randomized


Interventional Model:
Parallel


Masking:
None


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group A: Standard genetic counseling

Will receive standard genetic counseling prior to genetic testing.

BEHAVIORAL: Standard Genetic Counseling

  • Standard of care genetic counseling
EXPERIMENTAL: Group B: Educational video

Will watch a brief educational video that is approximately 8 minutes in length about the genetic testing process and what to expect prior to genetic testing.

BEHAVIORAL: Educational Video

  • Video tutorial about genetic testing
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Rate of patients who have germline genetic testsMeasurement of genetic testing uptake in breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer patients randomized to pre-genetic test (pre-test) in-person counseling with a genetic counselor per standard of care or video education.This comparison will use a two-sided Fisher exact testUp to 3 years
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Patient Satisfaction Survey following interventionMeasurement and comparison by randomized arm and communication of results of patient satisfaction using survey instruments. Administered immediately following the intervention. The survey evaluates the subject's satisfaction with the genetic testing process for both arms.Immediately following intervention
Result Disclosure Preference following interventionMeasurement and comparison by randomized arm and communication of results of patient disclosure preferences using survey instruments. Administered immediately following the intervention.Immediately following intervention
Patient Satisfaction 2 months following interventionMeasurement and comparison by randomized arm and communication of results of patient satisfaction using survey instruments. Administered two months after the intervention. The survey evaluates the subject's satisfaction with the genetic testing process for both arms.after results have been received, two months post-intervention
Psychological distress following interventionMICRA is a widely used validated 25-item measure that assesses psychosocial consequences associated with genetic testing for cancer. Section 1 contains 3 sub-scales: the Positive sub-scale (4 items), the Distress sub-scale (6 items), and the Uncertainty sub-scale (9 items) and two other items that do not fit into either sub-scale. Section 2 contains two items for participants who have children. Section 3 contains 2 items for participants who have/have had cancer. Responses are indicated on a 4 point scale for experiences in the past week. A higher score in the sub-scales or total scale indicated greater distress. The positive sub-scale is reverse scored to reflect this.after results have been received, two months post-intervention
Knowledge about genetics testingMeasurement and comparison by randomized arm and communication of results of Patient knowledge about genetics testing using survey instruments. Knowledge about genetic testing is evaluated through a Knowledge of Multigene Panel Testing survey immediately following the intervention.Immediately following intervention
Decisional RegretMeasurement and comparison by randomized arm and communication of results of Patient decisional regret to have genetic testing. Decisional regret is evaluated through a decisional regret survey that is administered two months after intervention.after results have been received, two months post-intervention
Family communication of genetic test resultsMeasurement of family communication. Family communication survey is administered two months following the intervention.after results have been received, two months post-intervention
Positive Results impactMeasurement of impact of positive results for patients who tested positive for a genetic mutation. This survey is administered four months post-intervention.after results have been received, four months post-intervention
Cascade testing in positivesMeasurement of cascade testing for patients who tested positive for a genetic mutation. This survey is administered four months post-intervention.after results have been received, four months post-intervention

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
1

    Inclusion Criteria:

  • Potentially eligible participants will be identified via medical record screening and/or in accordance with their clinical visit. A HIPAA waiver of authorization will be obtained by the enrolling Institution as needed to have access to the subject's medical record information for screening of eligibility.
  • A member of the study team will approach the potentially eligible participant in clinic and discuss the trial. Potentially eligible participants may choose to discuss participation further with their physician at their appointment
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or metastatic prostate cancer
  • No prior cancer genetic testing
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an informed consent document

  • Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Prisoners
  • Inability to understand English as a spoken language in a healthcare context
  • Known hematologic malignancy (e.g. CLL)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

  • Ambry Genetics

  • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Huma Rana, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

No publications available