$0.00
Shopping Cart
Facebook-f Instagram
DONATE
Donate

Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Phase III Study of ABI-007(Albumin-bound Paclitaxel) Plus Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

2009-03-01

2012-09-17

2013-04-09

861

Study Overview

Phase III Study of ABI-007(Albumin-bound Paclitaxel) Plus Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Phase III Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

A Phase III, open-label randomized, multicenter trial to compare ABI-007(Albumin-bound Paclitaxel)in combination with gemcitabine administered weekly to standard treatment (gemcitabine monotherapy) with respect to overall survival, objective tumor response rate and Progression Free Survival (PFS) in patients diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

  • Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
  • DRUG: Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007)
  • DRUG: Gemcitabine
  • CA046

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2009-02-13  

2013-10-21  

2019-11-07  

2009-02-13  

2013-10-21  

2019-11-25  

2009-02-16  

2013-12-11  

2019-11  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
Treatment

Allocation:
Randomized

Interventional Model:
Parallel

Masking:
None

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007)/Gemcitabine

ABI-007 125 mg/m2 administered in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks followed by one week of rest.

DRUG: Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007)

  • ABI-007 125 mg/m^2 administered by intravenous infusion

DRUG: Gemcitabine

  • Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 administered weekly for 7 weeks, Day 1 through Day 43 followed by a week of rest (Cycle 1), followed by cycles of weekly administration for 3 weeks, Days 1, 8, and 15 followed by a week of rest (Cycle 2 onward).
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Gemcitabine

Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 administered weekly for 7 weeks followed by a week of rest (Cycle 1), followed by cycles of weekly administration for 3 weeks followed by a week of rest (Cycle 2 onward).

DRUG: Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007)

  • ABI-007 125 mg/m^2 administered by intravenous infusion

DRUG: Gemcitabine

  • Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 administered weekly for 7 weeks, Day 1 through Day 43 followed by a week of rest (Cycle 1), followed by cycles of weekly administration for 3 weeks, Days 1, 8, and 15 followed by a week of rest (Cycle 2 onward).
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Overall Survival (OS)Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from all causes. Participants who did not die were censored at the last known time the participant was alive. Patient survival was summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods.From randomization to death; until the data cut off 17 Sept 2012. The maximum time in follow up was 37 months.
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Radiological Review (IRR)Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression, or death (any cause) on or prior to the clinical cutoff date, whichever occurred earlier. Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment, on or prior to the clinical cutoff, and the patient was progression free. If a patient began a new anti-cancer treatment prior to documented disease progression (or death), the patient was censored at the date of last assessment when the patient was documented as progression free prior to the intervention. Patients with two or more consecutive missing response assessments prior to a visit with documented progression (or death) were censored at the last date of tumor assessment when the patient was documented to be progression free. PFS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods.Randomization until disease progression or death from any cause; Until the data cut off of 17 Sept 2012. The maximum time in follow up was 37 months.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Overall Response by Independent Radiological Review (IRR)Objective tumor response was summarized as the percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed complete (CR) or partial response (PR) based on an independent blinded radiology assessment of response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. Using RECIST Version 1.0, participants were to achieve either a complete response (CR) defined as the disappearance of all known disease and no new sites or disease related symptoms confirmed at least 4 weeks after initial documentation or partial response (PR) defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions and no progression in non-target lesions based on confirmed responses from the investigator assessment of best overall response during study treatment.Assessment every 4 weeks after initial response; Day 1 to data cut off of 17 Sept 2013; maximum time on study 37 months

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion Criteria
    A participant will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria are met:
    1. Participant has definitive histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The definitive diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be made by integrating the histopathological data within the context of the clinical and radiographic data. Participants with islet cell neoplasms are excluded. 2. Initial diagnosis of metastatic disease must have occurred ≤6 weeks prior to randomization in the study. 3. Patient has one or more metastatic tumors measurable by Computed Tomography (CT) scan or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), if patient is allergic to CT contrast media). 4. Male or non-pregnant and non-lactating female, and ≥ 18 years of age. If a female patient is of child-bearing potential, as evidenced by regular menstrual periods, she must have a negative serum pregnancy test Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (β-hCG) documented 72 hours prior to the first administration of study drug.
    If sexually active, the patient must agree to use contraception considered adequate and appropriate by the Investigator during the period of administration of study drug. In addition, male and female patients must utilize contraception after the end of treatment as recommended in the product's Summary of Product Characteristics or Prescribing Information provided in the study manual. 5. Patients must have received no previous radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy or investigational therapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. Prior treatment with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine administered as a radiation sensitizer in the adjuvant setting is allowed, provided at least 6 months have elapsed since completion of the last dose and no lingering toxicities are present. Patients having received cytotoxic doses of gemcitabine or any other chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting are not eligible for this study. 6. Patient has adequate biological parameters as demonstrated by the following blood counts at Baseline (obtained ≤14 days prior to randomization):
    Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 × 10^9/L; Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3 (100 × 10^9/L); Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥ 9 g/dL. 7. Patient has the following blood chemistry levels at Baseline (obtained ≤14 days prior to randomization):
    Aspartate Transaminase (AST), Serum Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT), Alanine Transaminase ( ALT) Serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of normal range (ULN), unless liver metastases are clearly present, then ≤ 5 × ULN is allowed Total bilirubin ≤ ULN Serum creatinine within normal limits or calculated clearance ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 for patients with serum creatinine levels above or below the institutional normal value. If using creatinine clearance, actual body weight should be used for calculating creatinine clearance (e.g., using the Cockroft-Gault formula). For patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) >30 kg/m^2, lean body weight should be used instead. 8. Patient has acceptable coagulation studies (obtained ≤14 days prior to randomization) as demonstrated by prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) within normal limits (± 15%). 9. Patient has no clinically significant abnormalities in urinalysis results (obtained ≤14 days prior to randomization). 10. Patient has a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70. Two observers will be required to assess KPS. If discrepant, the one with the lowest assessment will be considered true. 11. Patients should be asymptomatic for jaundice prior to Day 1. Significant or symptomatic amounts of ascites should be drained prior to Day 1. Pain symptoms should be stable and should not require modifications in analgesic management prior to Day 1. 12. Patient has been informed about the nature of the study, and has agreed to participate in the study, and signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to participation in any study-related activities.
    Exclusion Criteria
    A patient will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply:
    1. Patient has known brain metastases, unless previously treated and well-controlled for at least 3 months (defined as clinically stable, no edema, no steroids and stable in 2 scans at least 4 weeks apart). 2. Patient has only locally advanced disease. 3. Patient has experienced a ≥10% decrease in KPS between baseline visit and within 72 hours prior to randomization. 4. Patient has a ≥20% decrease in serum albumin level between baseline visit and within 72 hours prior to randomization. 5. History of malignancy in the last 5 years. Patients with prior history of in situ cancer or basal or squamous cell skin cancer are eligible. Patients with other malignancies are eligible if they were cured by surgery alone or surgery plus radiotherapy and have been continuously disease-free for at least 5 years. 6. Patient uses Coumadin. 7. Patient has active, uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infection(s) requiring systemic therapy. 8. Patient has known historical or active infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C. 9. Patient has undergone major surgery, other than diagnostic surgery (i.e.--surgery done to obtain a biopsy for diagnosis without removal of an organ), within 4 weeks prior to Day 1 of treatment in this study. 10. Patient has a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or any of their excipients, or the patient exhibits any of the events outlined in the Contraindications or Special Warnings and Precautions sections of the product or comparator Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) or Prescribing Information. 11. History of connective tissue disorders (e.g., lupus, scleroderma, arteritis nodosa). 12. Patients with a history of interstitial lung disease. 13. History of chronic leukemias (e.g., chronic lymphocytic leukemia). 14. Patients with high cardiovascular risk, including, but not limited to, recent coronary stenting or myocardial infarction in the past year. 15. History of Peripheral Artery Disease (e.g,. claudication, Leo Buerger's disease). 16. Patient has serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems, or serious psychiatric disorders, which could compromise the patient's safety or the study data integrity. 17. Patient is enrolled in any other clinical protocol or investigational trial. 18. Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with study procedures, or is planning to take vacation for 7 or more consecutive days during the course of the study.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

    • PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR: Daniel Von Hoff, MD, Scottsdale Clinical Research Institute

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    • Tabernero J, Chiorean EG, Infante JR, Hingorani SR, Ganju V, Weekes C, Scheithauer W, Ramanathan RK, Goldstein D, Penenberg DN, Romano A, Ferrara S, Von Hoff DD. Prognostic factors of survival in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Oncologist. 2015 Feb;20(2):143-50. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0394. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
    • Chiorean EG, Von Hoff DD, Tabernero J, El-Maraghi R, Ma WW, Reni M, Harris M, Whorf R, Liu H, Li JS, Manax V, Romano A, Lu B, Goldstein D. Second-line therapy after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or after gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016 Jul 12;115(2):188-94. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.185. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
    • Tehfe M, Dowden S, Kennecke H, El-Maraghi R, Lesperance B, Couture F, Letourneau R, Liu H, Romano A. nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Canadian Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 MPACT Trial. Adv Ther. 2016 May;33(5):747-59. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0327-4. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
    • Scheithauer W, Ramanathan RK, Moore M, Macarulla T, Goldstein D, Hammel P, Kunzmann V, Liu H, McGovern D, Romano A, Von Hoff DD. Dose modification and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: phase III MPACT trial. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(3):469-78. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.01.03.
    • Vogel A, Rommler-Zehrer J, Li JS, McGovern D, Romano A, Stahl M. Efficacy and safety profile of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated to disease progression: a subanalysis from a phase 3 trial (MPACT). BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):817. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2798-8.
    • Kunzmann V, Ramanathan RK, Goldstein D, Liu H, Ferrara S, Lu B, Renschler MF, Von Hoff DD. Tumor Reduction in Primary and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Lesions With nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine: An Exploratory Analysis From a Phase 3 Study. Pancreas. 2017 Feb;46(2):203-208. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000742.
    • Tabernero J, Kunzmann V, Scheithauer W, Reni M, Shiansong Li J, Ferrara S, Djazouli K. nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a subgroup analysis of the Western European cohort of the MPACT trial. Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Feb 2;10:591-596. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S124097. eCollection 2017.
    • Ramanathan RK, Goldstein D, Korn RL, Arena F, Moore M, Siena S, Teixeira L, Tabernero J, Van Laethem JL, Liu H, McGovern D, Lu B, Von Hoff DD. Positron emission tomography response evaluation from a randomized phase III trial of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):648-53. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw020. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
    • Chiorean EG, Von Hoff DD, Reni M, Arena FP, Infante JR, Bathini VG, Wood TE, Mainwaring PN, Muldoon RT, Clingan PR, Kunzmann V, Ramanathan RK, Tabernero J, Goldstein D, McGovern D, Lu B, Ko A. CA19-9 decrease at 8 weeks as a predictor of overall survival in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):654-60. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw006. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
    • Goldstein D, Von Hoff DD, Moore M, Greeno E, Tortora G, Ramanathan RK, Macarulla T, Liu H, Pilot R, Ferrara S, Lu B. Development of peripheral neuropathy and its association with survival during treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: A subset analysis from a randomised phase III trial (MPACT). Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;52:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
    • Portal A, Pernot S, Tougeron D, Arbaud C, Bidault AT, de la Fouchardiere C, Hammel P, Lecomte T, Dreanic J, Coriat R, Bachet JB, Dubreuil O, Marthey L, Dahan L, Tchoundjeu B, Locher C, Lepere C, Bonnetain F, Taieb J. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after Folfirinox failure: an AGEO prospective multicentre cohort. Br J Cancer. 2015 Sep 29;113(7):989-95. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.328. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
    • Goldstein D, El-Maraghi RH, Hammel P, Heinemann V, Kunzmann V, Sastre J, Scheithauer W, Siena S, Tabernero J, Teixeira L, Tortora G, Van Laethem JL, Young R, Penenberg DN, Lu B, Romano A, Von Hoff DD. nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: long-term survival from a phase III trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan 31;107(2):dju413. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju413. Print 2015 Feb.
    • Vogel A, Pelzer U, Salah-Eddin AB, Koster W. First-line nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer from routine clinical practice. In Vivo. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):1135-40.
    • Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, Seay T, Tjulandin SA, Ma WW, Saleh MN, Harris M, Reni M, Dowden S, Laheru D, Bahary N, Ramanathan RK, Tabernero J, Hidalgo M, Goldstein D, Van Cutsem E, Wei X, Iglesias J, Renschler MF. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
    • Von Hoff DD, Cridebring D, Tian OY, Han H, Bhore R, Franco T, Ondovik MS, Louis CU. Analysis of the Role of Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels in Survival Outcomes in Patients from the Phase III MPACT Trial of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Oncologist. 2021 Apr;26(4):e704-e709. doi: 10.1002/onco.13645. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
    • McCleary-Wheeler AL, McWilliams R, Fernandez-Zapico ME. Aberrant signaling pathways in pancreatic cancer: a two compartment view. Mol Carcinog. 2012 Jan;51(1):25-39. doi: 10.1002/mc.20827.
    NPCF Pop up

    Make-A-Will Month

    Snag 6508be92
    Learn More
    Donate Now Online
    Other Ways to Donate